Archivos espanoles de urologia · 2018
Antireflux ureteral stent proof of concept assessment after minimally invasive treatment of obstructive uropathy in animal model.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Soria Federico, Morcillo Esther, de la Cruz Julia E, Serrano Alvaro, Estebanez Javier, Sanz Juan Luis, Chicharro Javier, Pamplona Manuel, Sanchez-Margallo Francisco M
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy of a new anti-reflux intraureteral stent design in a swine model after minimally invasive treatment of ureteral stricture to reduce ureteral stent morbidity, previous to manufacture this design in a biodegradable fashion.
METHODS: Twenty-eight female pigs were included. The study began with a cystoscopic, nephrosonographic and contrast fluoroscopic assessment. Afterwards, obstructive uropathy model in right ureter was created. Obstruction was confirmed 6 weeks later and animals were randomly distributed into 2 groups. Group I underwent laser endopyelotomy and Group-II laparoscopic pyeloplasty A 3Fr anti-reflux intraureteral stent was placed 6 weeks. Follow-up evaluations were performed at 3-6 weeks. The final follow-up was completed at 5 months and included the aforementioned diagnostic methods and pathological study.
RESULTS: None of the study animals showed any vesicoureteral reflux signs or ureteral orifice injury. There were no urinomas or ureteric fistulas. The dislodgement rate was 10.7%. After 6 weeks of stenting, 71.4% of ureters showed ureteral peristalsis below the stent, and 100% at the final follow-up. After pathological assessment, no differences were shown at UPJ and healing in the incised area was correct in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The new stent design avoids vesicoureteral reflux and bladder trigone irritation, consequently might reduce morbidity associated with double pigtail ureteral stents. This study also shows that it is only necessary temporary scaffolding the incised ureteral segment and not the entire length of the ureter after minimally invasive surgery. It is also necessary to manufacture this design in a biodegradable material, thus avoiding its removal.
METHODS: Twenty-eight female pigs were included. The study began with a cystoscopic, nephrosonographic and contrast fluoroscopic assessment. Afterwards, obstructive uropathy model in right ureter was created. Obstruction was confirmed 6 weeks later and animals were randomly distributed into 2 groups. Group I underwent laser endopyelotomy and Group-II laparoscopic pyeloplasty A 3Fr anti-reflux intraureteral stent was placed 6 weeks. Follow-up evaluations were performed at 3-6 weeks. The final follow-up was completed at 5 months and included the aforementioned diagnostic methods and pathological study.
RESULTS: None of the study animals showed any vesicoureteral reflux signs or ureteral orifice injury. There were no urinomas or ureteric fistulas. The dislodgement rate was 10.7%. After 6 weeks of stenting, 71.4% of ureters showed ureteral peristalsis below the stent, and 100% at the final follow-up. After pathological assessment, no differences were shown at UPJ and healing in the incised area was correct in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The new stent design avoids vesicoureteral reflux and bladder trigone irritation, consequently might reduce morbidity associated with double pigtail ureteral stents. This study also shows that it is only necessary temporary scaffolding the incised ureteral segment and not the entire length of the ureter after minimally invasive surgery. It is also necessary to manufacture this design in a biodegradable material, thus avoiding its removal.