Journal of clinical anesthesia · 1994
Midazolam does not antagonize fentanyl-mediated analgesia in surgical patients.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Behne M, Lischke V, Asskali F, Probst S, Hermann R, Vettermann J
Аннотация
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine whether midazolam possesses a clinically significant antianalgesic action in surgical patients.
DESIGN: Randomized, controlled study.
SETTING: Inpatient anesthesia at a university department of neurosurgery.
PATIENTS: 2 groups of 10 patients each who were scheduled for supratentorial brain surgery, did not have elevated intracranial pressure, and were free from systemic disease.
INTERVENTIONS: Patients underwent anesthesia induction with hexobarbital, succinylcholine, and pancuronium; anesthesia was maintained with injections of droperidol-fentanyl (Group 1) or with midazolam-fentanyl (Group 2) following a predetermined repetitive dosing schedule, such that fentanyl 0.1 mg was injected upon predominant increases in heart rate, whereas droperidol 2.5 mg or midazolam 2.5 mg was injected upon increases in blood pressure.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Duration of anesthesia and invasiveness of surgery were similar in both groups. The amount of fentanyl required was 0.55 +/- 0.18 mg/hr (mean +/- SD) in Group 1 and 0.53 +/- 0.17 mg/hr in Group 2. Injections of droperidol 7.5 +/- 3.4 mg/hr (Group 1) and midazolam 5.9 +/- 2.3 mg/hr (Group 2) were administered intraoperatively. This redosing regimen was associated with uninterrupted hemodynamic stability, indicating comparable and adequate anesthetic depth. Plasma concentrations of metabolites and hormones indicative of humoral stress activation did not differ between groups.
CONCLUSION: Under these clinical conditions, the administration of midazolam, when compared with droperidol, was not associated with signs of any antagonistic or antianalgesic action toward fentanyl-mediated analgesia.
DESIGN: Randomized, controlled study.
SETTING: Inpatient anesthesia at a university department of neurosurgery.
PATIENTS: 2 groups of 10 patients each who were scheduled for supratentorial brain surgery, did not have elevated intracranial pressure, and were free from systemic disease.
INTERVENTIONS: Patients underwent anesthesia induction with hexobarbital, succinylcholine, and pancuronium; anesthesia was maintained with injections of droperidol-fentanyl (Group 1) or with midazolam-fentanyl (Group 2) following a predetermined repetitive dosing schedule, such that fentanyl 0.1 mg was injected upon predominant increases in heart rate, whereas droperidol 2.5 mg or midazolam 2.5 mg was injected upon increases in blood pressure.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Duration of anesthesia and invasiveness of surgery were similar in both groups. The amount of fentanyl required was 0.55 +/- 0.18 mg/hr (mean +/- SD) in Group 1 and 0.53 +/- 0.17 mg/hr in Group 2. Injections of droperidol 7.5 +/- 3.4 mg/hr (Group 1) and midazolam 5.9 +/- 2.3 mg/hr (Group 2) were administered intraoperatively. This redosing regimen was associated with uninterrupted hemodynamic stability, indicating comparable and adequate anesthetic depth. Plasma concentrations of metabolites and hormones indicative of humoral stress activation did not differ between groups.
CONCLUSION: Under these clinical conditions, the administration of midazolam, when compared with droperidol, was not associated with signs of any antagonistic or antianalgesic action toward fentanyl-mediated analgesia.