[Biological diagnosis of pheochromocytoma: is there an interest in urinary metanephrines measurement over 3 consecutive days?].

Pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma are neuroendocrine tumors characterized by a catecholamine production potential. The biochemical diagnosis for this type of tumor is carried out through the metanephrine titration on 24-hours urines. Some authors have suggested that the sensitivity of the test could be improved by sampling and analyzing urines 3 days in a row (cycle) versus a unique measurement but this method has never been fully evaluated. The goal of this study was to establish a comparison of diagnosis performances between urinary metanephrines measurement for 3 consecutive days, and metanephrines measurement on a unique 24-hour sample. Patients of Brest Regional University Hospital whose 3-consecutive day 24-hour urine samples had been analyzed from January 2011 to May 2017 were included in this study. The primary endpoint was the comparison of diagnostic performances of urinary metanephrine titration over a single day versus 3 consecutive days. Eighty-two patients for a total of 103 cycles among which 7 revealed a pheochromocytoma were analyzed. ROC curve analysis shows that the metanephrine cycle titration method is more efficient than the metanephrine single titration method (metanephrine: AUC=0.881 against 0.826 respectively; normetanephrine: AUC=0.946 against 0.901 respectively). Urinary titration over 3 days allows the diagnosis of 100% (7/7) of pheochromocytomas against 85.7% (6/7) for the the single urinary titration. In conclusion, metanephrine titration over 3 consecutive days of 24-hours urine samples shows a better sensitivity and better diagnosis performances for detecting pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma than the single titration method.