Urology · 2009
Identification of spermatozoa in archived testicular cancer specimens: implications for bench side sperm retrieval at orchiectomy.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Delouya Guila, Baazeem Abdulaziz, Boman Jason M, Violette Philippe, Saad Fred, Zini Armand
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the patterns of spermatogenesis in the normal testicular parenchyma of primary testicular cancers and estimate the feasibility of sperm retrieval at the time of radical orchiectomy.
METHODS: We reviewed the archived histologic sections of 39 consecutive patients who had undergone radical orchiectomy for primary testicular cancer at 3 university-affiliated hospitals. We examined all areas of normal (noncancerous) testicular parenchyma to evaluate the level of spermatogenesis and presence of mature spermatozoa in these sections. A minimum of 100 seminiferous tubules were scored per case. We also evaluated the epididymal tubules for the presence of mature spermatozoa. A review of the clinical chart was performed to evaluate the relationship between clinical data and histologic findings.
RESULTS: In nearly 40% of the cases evaluated (15/38), the predominant histologic pattern was full spermatogenesis. Mature spermatozoa were identified in nearly 80% (30/38) of the testicular histologic sections and in 50% (14/28) of the evaluable epididymal sections. Clinical stage (presence of extranodal disease) and tumor marker levels were related to the probability of identifying mature spermatozoa in the testis.
CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that sperm retrieval at the time of radical orchiectomy is a feasible fertility option, with a 40% probability of recovering spermatozoa by random biopsy of the noncancerous testicular parenchyma and an 80% probability of recovering spermatozoa with a more extensive dissection. In 50% men, spermatozoa may be recovered by epididymal aspiration alone.
METHODS: We reviewed the archived histologic sections of 39 consecutive patients who had undergone radical orchiectomy for primary testicular cancer at 3 university-affiliated hospitals. We examined all areas of normal (noncancerous) testicular parenchyma to evaluate the level of spermatogenesis and presence of mature spermatozoa in these sections. A minimum of 100 seminiferous tubules were scored per case. We also evaluated the epididymal tubules for the presence of mature spermatozoa. A review of the clinical chart was performed to evaluate the relationship between clinical data and histologic findings.
RESULTS: In nearly 40% of the cases evaluated (15/38), the predominant histologic pattern was full spermatogenesis. Mature spermatozoa were identified in nearly 80% (30/38) of the testicular histologic sections and in 50% (14/28) of the evaluable epididymal sections. Clinical stage (presence of extranodal disease) and tumor marker levels were related to the probability of identifying mature spermatozoa in the testis.
CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that sperm retrieval at the time of radical orchiectomy is a feasible fertility option, with a 40% probability of recovering spermatozoa by random biopsy of the noncancerous testicular parenchyma and an 80% probability of recovering spermatozoa with a more extensive dissection. In 50% men, spermatozoa may be recovered by epididymal aspiration alone.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdultAnalysis of VarianceCohort StudiesCryopreservationEpididymisFeasibility StudiesFollow-Up StudiesHospitals, UniversityHumansImmunohistochemistryMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisOrchiectomyProbabilityRegistriesRegression AnalysisRisk FactorsSemen PreservationSperm RetrievalSpermatogenesisSpermatozoaTesticular NeoplasmsYoung Adult