Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2019
Do the stump knotting technique and specimen retrieval method effect morbidity in laparoscopic appendectomy?
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Agalar Cihan, Derici Serhan, Çevlik Ali Durubey, Aksoy Süleyman Özkan, Egeli Tufan, Boztaş Nilay, Özbilgin Mücahit, Sarıoğlu Sülen, Ünek Tarkan
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Stump closure is the most important part of a laparoscopic appendectomy (LA). Closing the appendix base with knot tying is the most cost-effective method. The defined risk factor for surgical site infection (SSI) after LA is the contamination of trocar entry area by inflamed appendicitis. This study aims to compare the single and double knot technique for stump control and specimen removal methods in LA.
METHODS: The data of patients who underwent LA between January 2015 and January 2017 were obtained from prospectively collected database. Single and double knot technique, specimen removal method, operation duration, hospital stay, and perioperative-postoperative complications were compared.
RESULTS: Extracorporeal double knot was used in 134 patients (63%), and single knot was used in 79 patients (37%). There was no difference between operation duration in the two groups (p=0.97). No stump leakage was observed in any patient. Intraabdominal abscess developed in three patients (1.4%). Appendix was removed from the abdomen directly in 101 patients (47%) and using specimen retrieval bag in 112 (53%). SSI developed in five patients (2.3%), and appendices of all of these five patients were removed from abdomen without using specimen retrieval bag. No SSI was detected in the group that used the specimen retrieval bag (p=0.02).
CONCLUSION: Single or double knot(s) tying can be defined as safe and cost-effective stump closure method. The risk of developing SSI can be reduced using specimen retrieval bag.
METHODS: The data of patients who underwent LA between January 2015 and January 2017 were obtained from prospectively collected database. Single and double knot technique, specimen removal method, operation duration, hospital stay, and perioperative-postoperative complications were compared.
RESULTS: Extracorporeal double knot was used in 134 patients (63%), and single knot was used in 79 patients (37%). There was no difference between operation duration in the two groups (p=0.97). No stump leakage was observed in any patient. Intraabdominal abscess developed in three patients (1.4%). Appendix was removed from the abdomen directly in 101 patients (47%) and using specimen retrieval bag in 112 (53%). SSI developed in five patients (2.3%), and appendices of all of these five patients were removed from abdomen without using specimen retrieval bag. No SSI was detected in the group that used the specimen retrieval bag (p=0.02).
CONCLUSION: Single or double knot(s) tying can be defined as safe and cost-effective stump closure method. The risk of developing SSI can be reduced using specimen retrieval bag.