MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.12.010

Медицинская библиотека · American journal of surgery · 2018

Size matters: Computed tomographic measurements of the appendix in emergency department scans.

Moskowitz Eliza, Khan Abid D, Cribari Chris, Schroeppel Thomas J

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Radiologists use a size cutoff in appendiceal diameter to assist surgeons in diagnosing appendicitis, however, no consensus exists as to the size of a normal adult appendix. We aim to evaluate radial appendiceal diameter on CT in adult patients both with and without appendicitis.

METHODS

Retrospective review of adults who underwent abdominal CT was performed. Variables collected include: demographics, BMI, WBC count at presentation, radial diameter of appendix (mm), presence of fat stranding, fecalith, and free fluid.

RESULTS

During the study period, 3099 patients underwent CT. The appendix was visualized on 74% of scans. Mean appendiceal diameter was 6.6 mm (±1.7). The appendix was larger in patients with appendicitis (6.6 vs. 11.4; p < 0.0001). Overall appendectomy incidence was 3.2%. Sensitivity and specificity of CT in diagnosing appendicitis in this cohort of patients were 90% and 94%. NPV was 99.5%.

CONCLUSION

While appendiceal diameter was larger in patients with appendicitis, >20% of patients without appendicitis had an appendiceal diameter >7 mm. Diameter alone should not be relied upon to diagnose appendicitis.

Для цитирования: Moskowitz Eliza, Khan Abid D, Cribari Chris, Schroeppel Thomas J. Size matters: Computed tomographic measurements of the appendix in emergency department scans.. American journal of surgery. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.12.010.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.