Zhonghua kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Zhonghua kouqiang yixue zazhi = Chinese journal of stomatology · 1999
[Evaluation of normal submandibular gland function by sialo-scintigraphy].
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zhang F, Yu G, Ma D
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To study the normal glandular function of the submandibular gland as a background for evaluation of changes in submandibular gland diseases.
METHODS: The backgrounds of both submandibular area and temporal area were analyzed comparatively with Emission Computerized Tomography in eleven pairs of normal submandibular gland.
RESULTS: About 2.18 times of the temporal background equals to submandibular area background; the Concentrate Index of normal submandibular gland was 1.42 +/- 0.89; the Secretory Index was (109.4 +/- 39.8)%, the Secretory Index Ratio and the Concentrate Index Ratio were (77.2 +/- 17.2)% and 71.0 +/- 15.2% respectively; and the Function Index was (89.9 +/- 7.4)%.
CONCLUSION: The use of submandibular area background and functional index to represent submandibular gland function is more accurate and more sensitive. Normal functional index can provide the basis for researching submandibular gland disease.
METHODS: The backgrounds of both submandibular area and temporal area were analyzed comparatively with Emission Computerized Tomography in eleven pairs of normal submandibular gland.
RESULTS: About 2.18 times of the temporal background equals to submandibular area background; the Concentrate Index of normal submandibular gland was 1.42 +/- 0.89; the Secretory Index was (109.4 +/- 39.8)%, the Secretory Index Ratio and the Concentrate Index Ratio were (77.2 +/- 17.2)% and 71.0 +/- 15.2% respectively; and the Function Index was (89.9 +/- 7.4)%.
CONCLUSION: The use of submandibular area background and functional index to represent submandibular gland function is more accurate and more sensitive. Normal functional index can provide the basis for researching submandibular gland disease.