Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques · 2010
Minimally invasive retroperitoneal pancreatic necrosectomy in the management of infected pancreatitis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lakshmanan Radhika, Iyer Shridhar Ganpathi, Lee Victor T W, Chang Stephen K Y, Madhavan Krishnakumar
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Surgical debridement is the mainstay in the management of infected pancreatic necrosis. Minimally invasive techniques have been shown to minimize surgical insult. We aim to review our recent experience with minimally invasive retroperitoneal pancreatic necrosectomy (MIRP).
METHODS: The medical records of consecutive patients between October 2007 and April 2008 who underwent MIRP at our hospital were reviewed. All the patients had a preoperative computed tomography-guided aspiration and positive bacteriologic culture of the peripancreatic collection.
RESULTS: Five patients underwent MIRP during the 8-month period. Fourteen procedures were carried out, with a median of 3 (range, 1 to 5) procedures per patient. Only 1 patient required postoperative intensive care monitoring. One patient had a left renal contusion that resolved, and 2 patients developed pancreatic fistula owing to pancreatic duct disruption requiring stenting of the pancreatic duct. There were no mortalities.
CONCLUSION: MIRP is a good alternative technique in the management of selected patients with infected peripancreatic necrosis.
METHODS: The medical records of consecutive patients between October 2007 and April 2008 who underwent MIRP at our hospital were reviewed. All the patients had a preoperative computed tomography-guided aspiration and positive bacteriologic culture of the peripancreatic collection.
RESULTS: Five patients underwent MIRP during the 8-month period. Fourteen procedures were carried out, with a median of 3 (range, 1 to 5) procedures per patient. Only 1 patient required postoperative intensive care monitoring. One patient had a left renal contusion that resolved, and 2 patients developed pancreatic fistula owing to pancreatic duct disruption requiring stenting of the pancreatic duct. There were no mortalities.
CONCLUSION: MIRP is a good alternative technique in the management of selected patients with infected peripancreatic necrosis.