Clinical oral investigations · 2023
Effects of different doses of ionizing radiation on alveolar bone repair in post-extraction tooth socket: an experimental study in rats.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Borges Juliana Simeão, Paula Isabella Santos, de Araújo Reis Nayara Teixeira, de Lima Oliveira Ana Paula, Soares Carlos José, Soares Priscilla Barbosa Ferreira
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the dose-response effects of ionizing radiation (IR) on alveolar bone repair and bone strength after tooth extraction.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 32 male Wistar rats were used in the study, 28 animals were included in the final analysis, and n = 7 for each experimental group. Mandibular first molars were extracted. After 7 days, the animals were randomly divided into four groups according to single-dose irradiation: NIr, control group; Ir15, irradiated at 15 Gy; Ir20, irradiated at 20 Gy; and Ir30, irradiated at 30 Gy. The tooth extraction sites were subjected to micro-computed tomography (micro-CT), histological, histomorphometric, and biomechanical analyses 14 days after extraction. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test (α = 0.05).
RESULTS: Micro-CT analysis revealed that IR led to lower values of bone volume (BV, in mm3) (0.68 ± 0.08, P < 0.001) and bone volume fraction, ratio of the segmented bone volume to the total volume of the region of interest (BV/TV, in %) (44.1 ± 8.3, P < 0.001) for the Ir30 group compared to the control group. A significantly lower amount of newly formed bone was observed in the Ir30 (P = 0.005) than in the Ir15 group. The histomorphometric results of quantification of bone matrix neoformation and the micro-CT were in agreement, demonstrating greater damage to the Ir30 group. IR30 cells showed a lower percentage of densely packed collagen than control cells. No significant differences were found in the biomechanical parameters.
CONCLUSION: IR affects alveolar bone repair. A dose of 30 Gy reduced the bone healing process owing to a smaller amount of newly formed bone and a lower percentage of densely packed collagen. Therefore, a dose of 30 Gy can be used to successfully establish an animal model of an irradiated mandible that mimics the irradiated clinical conditions.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Radiotherapy can lead to severe side effects and tooth extraction is a major risk factor. A proper understanding of the pathological mechanisms of radiation in alveolar bone repair requires the establishment of a suitable animal model of clinical conditions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 32 male Wistar rats were used in the study, 28 animals were included in the final analysis, and n = 7 for each experimental group. Mandibular first molars were extracted. After 7 days, the animals were randomly divided into four groups according to single-dose irradiation: NIr, control group; Ir15, irradiated at 15 Gy; Ir20, irradiated at 20 Gy; and Ir30, irradiated at 30 Gy. The tooth extraction sites were subjected to micro-computed tomography (micro-CT), histological, histomorphometric, and biomechanical analyses 14 days after extraction. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test (α = 0.05).
RESULTS: Micro-CT analysis revealed that IR led to lower values of bone volume (BV, in mm3) (0.68 ± 0.08, P < 0.001) and bone volume fraction, ratio of the segmented bone volume to the total volume of the region of interest (BV/TV, in %) (44.1 ± 8.3, P < 0.001) for the Ir30 group compared to the control group. A significantly lower amount of newly formed bone was observed in the Ir30 (P = 0.005) than in the Ir15 group. The histomorphometric results of quantification of bone matrix neoformation and the micro-CT were in agreement, demonstrating greater damage to the Ir30 group. IR30 cells showed a lower percentage of densely packed collagen than control cells. No significant differences were found in the biomechanical parameters.
CONCLUSION: IR affects alveolar bone repair. A dose of 30 Gy reduced the bone healing process owing to a smaller amount of newly formed bone and a lower percentage of densely packed collagen. Therefore, a dose of 30 Gy can be used to successfully establish an animal model of an irradiated mandible that mimics the irradiated clinical conditions.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Radiotherapy can lead to severe side effects and tooth extraction is a major risk factor. A proper understanding of the pathological mechanisms of radiation in alveolar bone repair requires the establishment of a suitable animal model of clinical conditions.