Aesthetic surgery journal · 2025
Platelet-Derived Exosome Vulvar Injections for Sexual Dysfunction: A Retrospective Review.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Aglamis Savas Ozgur
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Platelet-rich plasma (PRP)-derived exosomes have been used for a very long time in genital area rejuvenation applications.
OBJECTIVES: The authors of this study aim to investigate the effect of the newly defined genital PRP-derived exosome injection point compared with conventional genital injection points.
METHODS: PRP-derived exosomes were taken into two 1 cc syringes. Four injection areas were determined. Only 1 area was injected in each group. In Group A, a total of 2 cc of exosome was injected into the right and left lateral parts of the clitoral glans at 3 to 9 o'clock with a 32 G 4 mm syringe tip. The procedure was applied so that the entire 4 mm syringe tip entered the tissue. In Group B, a total of 2 cc of exosome was injected into the G-spot area around the distal third of the anterior wall with a point-by-point technique with a 32 G 4 mm syringe tip. In Group C, exosome injection was performed with a 32 G 4 mm syringe tip, 1 cc on the right side, 1 cc on the left side, and 2 cc in total, to the periurethral area. In Group D, exosome injection was performed at the junction point of frenulum, prepuce, and labium minus and its surroundings: 1 cc on the right side, 1 cc on the left side, and 2 cc in total. This procedure was performed in 3 sessions, 4 weeks apart. All patients were evaluated with the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) scale before the first session and 6 and 12 months after the third session.
RESULTS: The difference between the FSFI increase levels in 2 different periods for each group was evaluated. Accordingly, the FSFI increase in Group A was similar to the increase in Group D (P = .715). The FSFI increase in Group B was similar to the increase in Group C (P = .437). The FSFI increase in Groups A and D was statistically greater than the increase in Groups B and C (Group A vs Group B, P = .001; Group A vs Group C, P = .015; Group D vs Group B, P = .027; Group D vs Group C, P = .018).
CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first example in the literature in terms of evaluating the difference between the points where PRP-derived exosomes were applied. This new point injection increased FSFI better than Group A and was as effective as Groups B and C. The effectiveness of this newly defined method has been investigated with a single-point injection point, and it is seen that the frequency of application will increase because of its easy applicability, low cost and low side effect rate.
OBJECTIVES: The authors of this study aim to investigate the effect of the newly defined genital PRP-derived exosome injection point compared with conventional genital injection points.
METHODS: PRP-derived exosomes were taken into two 1 cc syringes. Four injection areas were determined. Only 1 area was injected in each group. In Group A, a total of 2 cc of exosome was injected into the right and left lateral parts of the clitoral glans at 3 to 9 o'clock with a 32 G 4 mm syringe tip. The procedure was applied so that the entire 4 mm syringe tip entered the tissue. In Group B, a total of 2 cc of exosome was injected into the G-spot area around the distal third of the anterior wall with a point-by-point technique with a 32 G 4 mm syringe tip. In Group C, exosome injection was performed with a 32 G 4 mm syringe tip, 1 cc on the right side, 1 cc on the left side, and 2 cc in total, to the periurethral area. In Group D, exosome injection was performed at the junction point of frenulum, prepuce, and labium minus and its surroundings: 1 cc on the right side, 1 cc on the left side, and 2 cc in total. This procedure was performed in 3 sessions, 4 weeks apart. All patients were evaluated with the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) scale before the first session and 6 and 12 months after the third session.
RESULTS: The difference between the FSFI increase levels in 2 different periods for each group was evaluated. Accordingly, the FSFI increase in Group A was similar to the increase in Group D (P = .715). The FSFI increase in Group B was similar to the increase in Group C (P = .437). The FSFI increase in Groups A and D was statistically greater than the increase in Groups B and C (Group A vs Group B, P = .001; Group A vs Group C, P = .015; Group D vs Group B, P = .027; Group D vs Group C, P = .018).
CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first example in the literature in terms of evaluating the difference between the points where PRP-derived exosomes were applied. This new point injection increased FSFI better than Group A and was as effective as Groups B and C. The effectiveness of this newly defined method has been investigated with a single-point injection point, and it is seen that the frequency of application will increase because of its easy applicability, low cost and low side effect rate.