Progres en urologie : journal de l'Association francaise d'urologie et de la Societe francaise d'urologie · 2001
[Multicenter study on dose escalation with conformal and conventional radiotherapy for the treatment of localized prostatic cancer. Preliminary results of tolerance and quality of life].
Клиническое исследованиеАннотация на английскомСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Beckendorf V, Pommier P, Carrie C, Bey P, Cowen D, Gonzague-Casabianca L, Maingon P, Horiot J C, Lagrange J L, Madelis G, Luporsi E
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To study the safety of conformal radiotherapy dose escalation up to 80 Gy for curative treatment of prostate cancer.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A multicentre trial sponsored by the PHRC include 164 patients under the age of 75 years with stage T1b-T3 N0 M0 prostatic adenocarcinoma, between 1995 and 1998. The prostate was treated at 5 dose levels: 18 patients at 66 Gy, 28 at 70 Gy, 49 at 74 Gy, 48 at 78 Gy, 21 at 80 Gy. The acute and delayed toxicity was graded according to a multidisciplinary glossary. Quality of life was evaluated before and one year after treatment using the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire and additional questions.
RESULTS: 89% and 55% of mild or moderate gastrointestinal and urinary adverse effects were observed during treatment, respectively. At long-term follow-up, of the 162 evaluable patients, 12.3% presented grade 2 adverse effects and 2.5% presented grade 3 adverse effects (1 case of haematuria, 2 urethral strictures, 1 bladder neck lesion) with no significant difference between the various dose levels. Two successive quality of life questionnaires were available for 119 patients: tiredness, pain and dyspnoea increased in parallel, but non-significantly in the groups receiving conventional doses or high doses. The proportion of patients reporting sexual activity without endocrine therapy decreased from 48% before treatment to 35% one year later. The proportion of patients with no clinical or laboratory signs of progression was higher in the high-dose group.
CONCLUSION: No significant difference was observed between conventional dose levels and high dose levels in terms of toxicity or quality of life. As the adverse effects were acceptable, a randomized trial comparing 70 Gy and 80 Gy has been initiated.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A multicentre trial sponsored by the PHRC include 164 patients under the age of 75 years with stage T1b-T3 N0 M0 prostatic adenocarcinoma, between 1995 and 1998. The prostate was treated at 5 dose levels: 18 patients at 66 Gy, 28 at 70 Gy, 49 at 74 Gy, 48 at 78 Gy, 21 at 80 Gy. The acute and delayed toxicity was graded according to a multidisciplinary glossary. Quality of life was evaluated before and one year after treatment using the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire and additional questions.
RESULTS: 89% and 55% of mild or moderate gastrointestinal and urinary adverse effects were observed during treatment, respectively. At long-term follow-up, of the 162 evaluable patients, 12.3% presented grade 2 adverse effects and 2.5% presented grade 3 adverse effects (1 case of haematuria, 2 urethral strictures, 1 bladder neck lesion) with no significant difference between the various dose levels. Two successive quality of life questionnaires were available for 119 patients: tiredness, pain and dyspnoea increased in parallel, but non-significantly in the groups receiving conventional doses or high doses. The proportion of patients reporting sexual activity without endocrine therapy decreased from 48% before treatment to 35% one year later. The proportion of patients with no clinical or laboratory signs of progression was higher in the high-dose group.
CONCLUSION: No significant difference was observed between conventional dose levels and high dose levels in terms of toxicity or quality of life. As the adverse effects were acceptable, a randomized trial comparing 70 Gy and 80 Gy has been initiated.