Journal of investigative surgery : the official journal of the Academy of Surgical Research · 2022
Hysteroscopy Combined with Laser Vaporesection for Endometrial Polyps.
СтатьяМетаанализНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ren Hongyan, Duan Hua, Wang Sha, Chang Yanan
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and efficiency of hysteroscopic laser vaporesection and hysteroscopic resection in the treatment of endometrial polyps.Methods: The literatures in databases were searched comprehensively, the literatures that met the inclusion criteria were screened out and the data were extracted. The data were combined with Stata12.0 statistical software.
RESULTS: 4 literatures were included with a total sample size of 334. Meta-analysis showed that intraoperative blood loss in laser group was less than that in electrosurgical group [-3.043, 95% CI (-4.09, -2.00), P < 0.001]. Length of stay in the laser group was shorter than that in the electrotomy group [-1.013, 95% CI (-1.37, -0.65), P < 0.001]. The recurrence rate [0.275, 95%CI (0.135,0.563), P < 0.001] and complication rate [0.148, 95%CI (0.07,0.32), P < 0.001] in the laser group were lower than those in the electrotomy group. There was no significant difference in operative time between hysteroscopy combined with 2 μm laser and hysteroscopic electrotomy for endometrial polyps [-0.38, 95% CI (-1.34, 0.58), P = 0.441 > 0.05].
CONCLUSION: Hysteroscopic 2 μm laser vaporesection for the treatment of endometrial polyps has better safety and clinical efficacy. Compared with hysteroscopic electroresection, hysteroscopic laser vaporesection in the treatment of endometrial polyps may be safer and more effective. Given the potential limitations, we need larger, well-designed randomized controlled trials to verify our findings.
RESULTS: 4 literatures were included with a total sample size of 334. Meta-analysis showed that intraoperative blood loss in laser group was less than that in electrosurgical group [-3.043, 95% CI (-4.09, -2.00), P < 0.001]. Length of stay in the laser group was shorter than that in the electrotomy group [-1.013, 95% CI (-1.37, -0.65), P < 0.001]. The recurrence rate [0.275, 95%CI (0.135,0.563), P < 0.001] and complication rate [0.148, 95%CI (0.07,0.32), P < 0.001] in the laser group were lower than those in the electrotomy group. There was no significant difference in operative time between hysteroscopy combined with 2 μm laser and hysteroscopic electrotomy for endometrial polyps [-0.38, 95% CI (-1.34, 0.58), P = 0.441 > 0.05].
CONCLUSION: Hysteroscopic 2 μm laser vaporesection for the treatment of endometrial polyps has better safety and clinical efficacy. Compared with hysteroscopic electroresection, hysteroscopic laser vaporesection in the treatment of endometrial polyps may be safer and more effective. Given the potential limitations, we need larger, well-designed randomized controlled trials to verify our findings.