Biomarkers for Predicting Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma in a Mexican Population.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Aguilar-Madrid Guadalupe, Pesch Beate, Calderón-Aranda Emma S, Burek Katarzyna, Jiménez-Ramírez Carmina, Juárez-Pérez Cuauhtémoc Arturo, Ochoa-Vázquez María Dolores, Torre-Bouscoulet Luis, Acosta-Saavedra Leonor Concepción, Sada-Ovalle Isabel, García-Figueroa Jorge, Alvarado-Cabrero Isabel, Castillo-González Patricia, Báez-Saldaña Alejandra Renata, Pérez-Padilla José Rogelio, Osnaya-Juárez Juvencio, Rivera-Rosales Rosa María, García-Bazán Eric Marco, Bautista-Aragón Yolanda Lizbeth, Lazcano-Hernandez Elimelec, Munguía-Canales Daniel Alejandro, Argote-Greene Luis Marcelo, Taeger Dirk, Weber Daniel Gilbert, Casjens Swaantje, Raiko Irina, Brüning Thomas, Johnen Georg
Аннотация
Background: Diagnosis of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) remains a challenge, especially when resources in pathology are limited. The study aimed to evaluate cost-effective tumor markers to predict the probability of MPM in plasma samples in order to accelerate the diagnostic workup of the tissue of potential cases. Methods: We conducted a case-control study stratified by gender, which included 75 incident cases with MPM from three Mexican hospitals and 240 controls frequency-matched by age and year of blood drawing. Plasma samples were obtained to determine mesothelin, calretinin, and thrombomodulin using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs). We estimated the performance of the markers based on the area under the curve (AUC) and predicted the probability of an MPM diagnosis of a potential case based on the marker concentrations. Results: Mesothelin and calretinin, but not thrombomodulin were significant predictors of a diagnosis of MPM with AUCs of 0.90 (95% CI: 0.85-0.95), 0.88 (95% CI: 0.82-0.94), and 0.51 (95% CI: 0.41-0.61) in males, respectively. For MPM diagnosis in men we estimated a true positive rate of 0.79 and a false positive rate of 0.11 for mesothelin. The corresponding figures for calretinin were 0.81 and 0.18, and for both markers combined 0.84 and 0.11, respectively. Conclusions: We developed prediction models based on plasma concentrations of mesothelin and calretinin to estimate the probability of an MPM diagnosis. Both markers showed a good performance and could be used to accelerate the diagnostic workup of tissue samples in Mexico.