International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 1994
Prognostic significance of ureteral obstruction in primary cervical cancer.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lee S K, Jones H W
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the prognostic significance of ureteral obstruction in women with cervical cancer and the result of aggressive urinary diversion.
METHODS: The clinical history and X-rays of 52 women with Stage III and IV cervical cancer seen at Vanderbilt University between 1981 and 1991 were retrospectively reviewed.
RESULTS: Twenty-nine (55.8%) of these patients had unilateral [15] or bilateral [14] ureteral obstruction. There was no statistically significant difference in the survival of patients whether or not ureteral obstruction was present. Ten of fourteen women with bilateral ureteral obstruction and 4 of the 15 patients with unilateral obstruction underwent urinary diversion by percutaneous nephrostomy [9] or retrograde ureteral catheterization [5]. Complications were few. Although patients who underwent urinary diversion had somewhat better survival, it was not statistically significant.
CONCLUSIONS: Some patients with ureteral obstruction due to advanced cervical cancer can be salvaged by prompt, aggressive urinary diversion, but large trials are needed to validate this approach.
METHODS: The clinical history and X-rays of 52 women with Stage III and IV cervical cancer seen at Vanderbilt University between 1981 and 1991 were retrospectively reviewed.
RESULTS: Twenty-nine (55.8%) of these patients had unilateral [15] or bilateral [14] ureteral obstruction. There was no statistically significant difference in the survival of patients whether or not ureteral obstruction was present. Ten of fourteen women with bilateral ureteral obstruction and 4 of the 15 patients with unilateral obstruction underwent urinary diversion by percutaneous nephrostomy [9] or retrograde ureteral catheterization [5]. Complications were few. Although patients who underwent urinary diversion had somewhat better survival, it was not statistically significant.
CONCLUSIONS: Some patients with ureteral obstruction due to advanced cervical cancer can be salvaged by prompt, aggressive urinary diversion, but large trials are needed to validate this approach.