Gynecologic oncology reports · 2024
Vulvar keratoacanthoma may be a malignant precursor: A case report and literature review.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chen Fang, Wang Yang, Haishaer Dina, Bai Feng
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Keratoacanthoma is a relatively rare skin tumor, with vulvar keratoacanthoma being even more uncommon. Although the majority of keratoacanthomas exhibit a benign course, a subset of cases may show features of malignant potential, such as marginal invasion and recurrence.
CASE: An 82-year-old female presented with a rapidly growing exophytic lesion on the left vulva, measuring 1.5 cm in diameter, accompanied by pruritus. The lesion had been present for two months. The patient underwent vulvar mass excision, and postoperative pathology revealed squamous cell hyperplasia with glassy cytoplasm and no significant cellular atypia. The surgical margins were clear. Three years later, the tumor recurred with disordered growth.
CONCLUSION: In terms of histological and clinical presentation, keratoacanthoma may overlap with classical well-differentiated squamous cell carcinoma. In rare cases, certain atypical keratoacanthomas may exhibit intravascular and perineural invasion, along with lymph node metastasis. By sharing our treatment experience of a patient with recurrent vulvar keratoacanthoma following surgery, we aim to provide a cautionary perspective for the clinical management of such cases.
CASE: An 82-year-old female presented with a rapidly growing exophytic lesion on the left vulva, measuring 1.5 cm in diameter, accompanied by pruritus. The lesion had been present for two months. The patient underwent vulvar mass excision, and postoperative pathology revealed squamous cell hyperplasia with glassy cytoplasm and no significant cellular atypia. The surgical margins were clear. Three years later, the tumor recurred with disordered growth.
CONCLUSION: In terms of histological and clinical presentation, keratoacanthoma may overlap with classical well-differentiated squamous cell carcinoma. In rare cases, certain atypical keratoacanthomas may exhibit intravascular and perineural invasion, along with lymph node metastasis. By sharing our treatment experience of a patient with recurrent vulvar keratoacanthoma following surgery, we aim to provide a cautionary perspective for the clinical management of such cases.