DOI 10.1080/10255842.2020.1812583
Frontal lobe oxyhemoglobin levels in patients with lower extremity burns assessed using a functional near-Infrared spectroscopy device during usual walking: a pilot study.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Understanding the mechanisms associated with locomotor networks may be of benefit for rehabilitation of burn victims with neurological locomotor deficits. A wearable functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) device has been developed for studying cortical hemodynamics.
OBJECTIVES
To investigate cortical brain activity during usual walking, we examined patterns of cortical activation using fNIRS device (NIRSIT®; OBELAB Inc., Seoul, Korea), in patients with neurological injury caused by lower extremity burns.
METHODS
This cross-sectional study assessed 15 patients with lower extremity burns, 10 patients with upper extremity burns, and 11 healthy controls. We measured walking-related cortical activity using an fNIRS device at baseline and during usual walking.
RESULTS
There was no significant difference between the burns groups in terms of age (43.50 ± 14.08 and 44.67 ± 6.92 years, P = 1.00), pain score of NRS (Numeric rating scale) (5.83 ± 1.19 and 6.67 ± 1.21, P = 0.18) or the mean time since injury (228.50 ± 83.43 and 199.33 ± 68.84 days, P = 0.78). Measures showed increased cortical activation in the prefrontal cortex in patients with lower extremity burns than in patients with healthy controls(P = 0.015). The measured HbO2 datas of the regions during usual walking in patients with lower extremity burn were insignificantly higher compared with the datas in patient with upper extremity burn (P = 0.302).
CONCLUSIONS
The patients with neurological injury due to lower extremity burns significantly rely more on cognitive resources even when performing a usual walking task.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.