The Journal of emergency medicine · 2022
Observer Variability as a Determinant of Measurement Error of Ultrasonographic Measurements of the Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter: A Systematic Review.
СтатьяСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hollestelle Rutger V A, Hansen Daniel, Hoeks Sanne E, van Meeteren Nico L U, Stolker Robert J, Maissan Iscander M
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Ultrasonographic measurements of the diameter of the sheath of the optic nerve can be used to assess intracranial pressure indirectly. These measurements come with measurement error.
OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to estimate observer's measurement error as a determinant of ultrasonographic measurement variability of the optic nerve sheath diameter.
METHODS: A systematic search of the literature was conducted in Embase, Medline, Web of Science, the Cochrane Central Register of Trials, and the first 200 articles of Google Scholar up to April 19, 2021. Inclusion criteria were the following: healthy adults, B-mode ultrasonography, and measurements 3 mm behind the retina. Studies were excluded if standard error of measurement could not be calculated. Nine studies featuring 389 participants (median 40; range 15-100) and 22 observers (median 2; range 1-4) were included. Standard error of measurement and minimal detectable differences were calculated to quantify observer variability. Quality and risk of bias were assessed with the Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies.
RESULTS: The standard error of measurement of the intra- and interobserver variability had a range of 0.10-0.41 mm and 0.14-0.42 mm, respectively. Minimal detectable difference of a single observer was 0.28-1.1 mm. Minimal detectable difference of multiple observers (range 2-4) was 0.40-1.1 mm. Quality assessment showed room for methodological improvement of included studies.
CONCLUSIONS: The standard errors of measurement and minimal detectable differences of ultrasonographic measurements of the optic nerve sheath diameter found in this review with healthy participants indicate caution should be urged when interpreting results acquired with this measurement method in clinical context.
OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to estimate observer's measurement error as a determinant of ultrasonographic measurement variability of the optic nerve sheath diameter.
METHODS: A systematic search of the literature was conducted in Embase, Medline, Web of Science, the Cochrane Central Register of Trials, and the first 200 articles of Google Scholar up to April 19, 2021. Inclusion criteria were the following: healthy adults, B-mode ultrasonography, and measurements 3 mm behind the retina. Studies were excluded if standard error of measurement could not be calculated. Nine studies featuring 389 participants (median 40; range 15-100) and 22 observers (median 2; range 1-4) were included. Standard error of measurement and minimal detectable differences were calculated to quantify observer variability. Quality and risk of bias were assessed with the Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies.
RESULTS: The standard error of measurement of the intra- and interobserver variability had a range of 0.10-0.41 mm and 0.14-0.42 mm, respectively. Minimal detectable difference of a single observer was 0.28-1.1 mm. Minimal detectable difference of multiple observers (range 2-4) was 0.40-1.1 mm. Quality assessment showed room for methodological improvement of included studies.
CONCLUSIONS: The standard errors of measurement and minimal detectable differences of ultrasonographic measurements of the optic nerve sheath diameter found in this review with healthy participants indicate caution should be urged when interpreting results acquired with this measurement method in clinical context.