Single-port robot-assisted pyeloplasty using the da Vinci SP system versus multi-port pyeloplasty: Comparison of outcomes and costs.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the feasibility of single-port (SP) robotic pyeloplasty by comparing perioperative outcomes with those of multiport (MP) robotic pyeloplasty.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

We reviewed the data from patients who underwent robot-assisted pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) at a single tertiary institution between March 2016 and May 2022. Radiographic and symptomatic improvements were assessed 3 months postoperatively. Propensity score matching was performed for age, sex, body mass index, and hydronephrosis grade.

RESULTS

Of the 15 S P-pyeloplasty and 28 MP-pyeloplasty cases, 14 from each group were matched using 1:1 matching. The SP group had shorter console and operative times without significant differences. Blood loss was lower in the SP group than in the MP group (p = 0.019). The length of hospital stay, opioid use on the operative day, and pain score at discharge did not differ between the two groups. The mean cost for surgery was higher in the SP group than in the MP group (p < 0.001). The mean cost of hospitalization was comparable between the two groups (p = 0.083). The cosmetic numerical rating scale scores were significantly higher in the SP group (p = 0.014). Symptoms improved in all patients, and the radiographic improvement rates were 92.9% in the SP group and 100% in the MP group.

CONCLUSION

SP-pyeloplasty showed cosmetic benefits, lower blood loss, operative time, and console time compared with MP-pyeloplasty. In patients who underwent surgery for UPJO for the first time, SP surgery can show comparable outcomes when compared to MP surgery.