The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS · 2024
Single port robot-assisted pyeloplasty: An early comparative outcomes analysis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ditonno Francesco, Franco Antonio, Manfredi Celeste, Feng Carol L, Bologna Eugenio, Licari Leslie Claire, Olweny Ephrem O, Vourganti Srinivas, Cherullo Edward E, Chow Alexander K, Autorino Riccardo
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The treatment paradigm for ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) has shifted towards minimally invasive pyeloplasty. A comparison Single Port (SP) and Multi Port (MP) robot-assisted pyeloplasty (RAP) was performed.
METHODS: Data from consecutive patients undergoing SP RAP or MP RAP between January 2021 and September 2023 were collected and analysed. Co-primary outcomes were length of stay (LOS), Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS), and narcotic dose. The choice of the robotic system depended on the surgeon's preference and availability of a specific robotic platform.
RESULTS: A total of 10 SP RAPs and 12 MP RAPs were identified. SP RAP patients were significantly younger [23 years (20-34)] than MP RAP [42 years (35.5-47.5), p < 0.01]. No difference in terms of OT (p = 0.6), LOS (p = 0.1), DVPRS (p = 0.2) and narcotic dose (p = 0.1) between the two groups was observed.
CONCLUSIONS: SP RAP can be implemented without compromising surgical outcomes and potentially offering some clinical advantages.
METHODS: Data from consecutive patients undergoing SP RAP or MP RAP between January 2021 and September 2023 were collected and analysed. Co-primary outcomes were length of stay (LOS), Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS), and narcotic dose. The choice of the robotic system depended on the surgeon's preference and availability of a specific robotic platform.
RESULTS: A total of 10 SP RAPs and 12 MP RAPs were identified. SP RAP patients were significantly younger [23 years (20-34)] than MP RAP [42 years (35.5-47.5), p < 0.01]. No difference in terms of OT (p = 0.6), LOS (p = 0.1), DVPRS (p = 0.2) and narcotic dose (p = 0.1) between the two groups was observed.
CONCLUSIONS: SP RAP can be implemented without compromising surgical outcomes and potentially offering some clinical advantages.