Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2024
Using Wavelet Analysis of Blood Flow Oscillations to Investigate Differences in Skin Blood Flow Regulations Between the Upper and Lower Limbs.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Guo Jiaqi, Lin Songmei, Hung Isabella Yu-Ju, Lin Cheng-Feng, Mo Pu-Chun, Sun Pu, Jan Yih-Kuen
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to investigate the differences in skin blood flow regulations between the upper and lower limbs in healthy adults using wavelet analysis of skin blood oscillations. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study investigating the dominant skin blood flow control of the upper and lower limbs in healthy adults.
METHODS: Skin blood flow of the forearm and leg was simultaneously measured by laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF) in 17 healthy adults. Skin blood flow oscillations were analyzed using wavelet analysis to assess the dominant control among the metabolic endothelial (0.0095-0.02 Hz), neurogenic (0.02-0.05 Hz), myogenic (0.05-0.15 Hz), respiratory (0.15-0.4 Hz), and cardiac (0.4-2 Hz) origins.
RESULTS: Skin blood flow in the leg (11.13 ± 4.90 perfusion unit) was significantly higher than in the forearm (6.90 ± 2.50 perfusion unit, p < 0.001). The metabolic endothelial control is more dominant in the forearm (1.19 ±0.51 au) compared to the leg (0.73 ± 0.41 au, p < 0.01). The myogenic control is more dominant in the leg (1.18 ± 0.28 au) compared to the forearm (0.96±0.18 au, p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Through wavelet analysis of skin blood flow oscillations, the results indicate that metabolic endothelial control is more dominant in the forearm (upper limbs) and myogenic control is more dominant in the leg (lower limbs).
METHODS: Skin blood flow of the forearm and leg was simultaneously measured by laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF) in 17 healthy adults. Skin blood flow oscillations were analyzed using wavelet analysis to assess the dominant control among the metabolic endothelial (0.0095-0.02 Hz), neurogenic (0.02-0.05 Hz), myogenic (0.05-0.15 Hz), respiratory (0.15-0.4 Hz), and cardiac (0.4-2 Hz) origins.
RESULTS: Skin blood flow in the leg (11.13 ± 4.90 perfusion unit) was significantly higher than in the forearm (6.90 ± 2.50 perfusion unit, p < 0.001). The metabolic endothelial control is more dominant in the forearm (1.19 ±0.51 au) compared to the leg (0.73 ± 0.41 au, p < 0.01). The myogenic control is more dominant in the leg (1.18 ± 0.28 au) compared to the forearm (0.96±0.18 au, p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Through wavelet analysis of skin blood flow oscillations, the results indicate that metabolic endothelial control is more dominant in the forearm (upper limbs) and myogenic control is more dominant in the leg (lower limbs).