The Journal of surgical research · 2020
Flow Cytometry for Detection and Quantification of Micrometastases in Sentinel Lymph Nodes from Patients with Primary Melanoma.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hellmich Luisa, Witte Kai-Erik, Ebinger Martin, Ulmer Anja
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Detection of micrometastases in the regional lymph nodes is one of the most important prognostic factors for melanoma patients. Our aim was to evaluate the suitability of flow cytometry for rapid quantification of disseminated melanoma cells in sentinel lymph nodes (SLN).
METHODS: 132 SLNs from 104 patients diagnosed with melanoma were analyzed by flow cytometry, utilizing the extracellular marker melanoma-associated chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan, in addition to quantitative immunocytology and conventional histopathology, including immunohistochemistry. For quantification, the number of melanoma-positive cells per million lymph node cells (disseminated cancer cell density, DCCD) detected by flow cytometry was compared to the DCCD obtained by immunocytology.
RESULTS: Compared to histopathology and immunocytology, flow cytometry exhibited a sensitivity of 50% and a specificity of 85%. DCCDs of immunocytology and flow cytometry of the 37 immunocytologically positive SLNs showed a positive correlation (Spearman's ρ = 0.7, P < 0.0001). In 10 SLNs from 9 patients with high tumor load, the flow cytometric DCCD was 8-fold higher on average than the immunocytologic DCCD.
CONCLUSIONS: Although flow cytometry is not yet suitable for early detection of metastatic melanoma, it promises to become a valuable tool for rapidly quantifying tumor load in high-risk patients.
METHODS: 132 SLNs from 104 patients diagnosed with melanoma were analyzed by flow cytometry, utilizing the extracellular marker melanoma-associated chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan, in addition to quantitative immunocytology and conventional histopathology, including immunohistochemistry. For quantification, the number of melanoma-positive cells per million lymph node cells (disseminated cancer cell density, DCCD) detected by flow cytometry was compared to the DCCD obtained by immunocytology.
RESULTS: Compared to histopathology and immunocytology, flow cytometry exhibited a sensitivity of 50% and a specificity of 85%. DCCDs of immunocytology and flow cytometry of the 37 immunocytologically positive SLNs showed a positive correlation (Spearman's ρ = 0.7, P < 0.0001). In 10 SLNs from 9 patients with high tumor load, the flow cytometric DCCD was 8-fold higher on average than the immunocytologic DCCD.
CONCLUSIONS: Although flow cytometry is not yet suitable for early detection of metastatic melanoma, it promises to become a valuable tool for rapidly quantifying tumor load in high-risk patients.