Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 1999
Sentinel lymph node biopsy with metastasis: can axillary dissection be avoided in some patients with breast cancer?
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Reynolds C, Mick R, Donohue J H, Grant C S, Farley D R, Callans L S, Orel S G, Keeney G L, Lawton T J, Czerniecki B J
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Recent studies have suggested that the sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is an accurate alternative staging procedure for women with breast cancer. The goal of this study was to identify a subset of breast cancer patients in whom metastatic disease was confined only to the SLN.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From two institutions, we recruited 222 women with breast cancer for SLN biopsy. A SLN biopsy was performed in each patient, followed by an axillary dissection in 182 patients. Histologic and immunohistochemical cytokeratin stains were used on all SLNs.
RESULTS: The SLN was identified in 220 (97. 8%) of the 225 biopsies. Evidence of metastatic breast cancer in the SLN was found in 60 (27.0%) of the 222 patients. Of these patients, 32 (53.3%) had evidence of tumor in the SLN only. By multivariate analysis, two factors were found to be significantly associated with a higher likelihood of tumor involvement in the non-SLNs: primary tumor size larger than 2.0 cm (P =.0004) and macrometastasis (> 2.0 mm) in the SLN (P =.002). Additional analysis revealed that none (0%; 95% confidence interval, 0% to 18.5%) of the 18 patients with primary tumors < or = 2.0 cm and micrometastasis to the SLN had remaining axillary lymph node involvement.
CONCLUSION: The primary tumor size and metastasis size in the SLN are independent factors in predicting the incidence of tumor in the non-SLNs. Therefore, the SLN biopsy alone may be adequate for staging and/or therapy decision making in patients with primary breast tumors < or = 2.0 cm and micrometastasis in the SLN.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From two institutions, we recruited 222 women with breast cancer for SLN biopsy. A SLN biopsy was performed in each patient, followed by an axillary dissection in 182 patients. Histologic and immunohistochemical cytokeratin stains were used on all SLNs.
RESULTS: The SLN was identified in 220 (97. 8%) of the 225 biopsies. Evidence of metastatic breast cancer in the SLN was found in 60 (27.0%) of the 222 patients. Of these patients, 32 (53.3%) had evidence of tumor in the SLN only. By multivariate analysis, two factors were found to be significantly associated with a higher likelihood of tumor involvement in the non-SLNs: primary tumor size larger than 2.0 cm (P =.0004) and macrometastasis (> 2.0 mm) in the SLN (P =.002). Additional analysis revealed that none (0%; 95% confidence interval, 0% to 18.5%) of the 18 patients with primary tumors < or = 2.0 cm and micrometastasis to the SLN had remaining axillary lymph node involvement.
CONCLUSION: The primary tumor size and metastasis size in the SLN are independent factors in predicting the incidence of tumor in the non-SLNs. Therefore, the SLN biopsy alone may be adequate for staging and/or therapy decision making in patients with primary breast tumors < or = 2.0 cm and micrometastasis in the SLN.