Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025
Enhancing pediatric abdominal pain diagnosis: the role of ultrasound layered scanning technique.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zhang Feng-Yan, Wang Fu-Jian, Wang Zhi-Fang, Qi Xiao-Qing
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Pediatric abdominal pain is a common yet diagnostically challenging symptom, particularly in young children who struggle to articulate their discomfort. With obesity increasingly affecting ultrasound accuracy, this study aimed to find the cause of pediatric abdominal pain by seeking new approaches and methods in ultrasound examination, especially in the application among obese or overweight pediatric patients.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on pediatric patients hospitalized between July 2016 and November 2017 for abdominal pain. Patients were categorized into normal weight, overweight, and obese groups. Conventional and layer-by-layer scanning methods were used by attending physicians to examine abdominal organs, including the liver, gallbladder, spleen, pancreas, kidneys, and bladder. An abdominal probe was employed for rapid screening, followed by a high-frequency probe for detailed three-layer scanning. Ultrasound images were analyzed alongside the children's symptoms and physical signs to provide diagnostic insights.
RESULTS: When comparing the conventional and stratified screening groups, several key differences were noted. The stratified group had higher detection rates for mesenteric lymphadenopathy (100% vs. 86%) and peritonitis (94% vs. 27%). Improved detection in the stratified group was due to the identification of peritoneal thickening, leading to higher detection rates for mesenteric fat inflammation (100% vs. 46%), appendicitis (94% vs. 63%), and urachal inflammation (100% vs. 0%). Detection rates for substantial lesions, such as gallstones and ovarian torsion, were similar in both groups (100%). The stratified group also showed significantly better detection of gastrointestinal conditions like gastroenteritis (97% vs. 32%), inguinal hernia (100% vs. 0%), and intestinal ascariasis (100% vs. 47%). Differences in detection rates were observed when abdominal fat layer thickness was between 0.8 and 1.7 cm, with more significant differences when thickness exceeded 1.7 cm.
CONCLUSIONS: Real-time ultrasound with stratified screening effectively detects abdominal and pelvic masses, solid organ lesions, and bowel wall thickening, improving disease detection in children, including individuals with increased body mass index. This method is valuable and recommended for wider use.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on pediatric patients hospitalized between July 2016 and November 2017 for abdominal pain. Patients were categorized into normal weight, overweight, and obese groups. Conventional and layer-by-layer scanning methods were used by attending physicians to examine abdominal organs, including the liver, gallbladder, spleen, pancreas, kidneys, and bladder. An abdominal probe was employed for rapid screening, followed by a high-frequency probe for detailed three-layer scanning. Ultrasound images were analyzed alongside the children's symptoms and physical signs to provide diagnostic insights.
RESULTS: When comparing the conventional and stratified screening groups, several key differences were noted. The stratified group had higher detection rates for mesenteric lymphadenopathy (100% vs. 86%) and peritonitis (94% vs. 27%). Improved detection in the stratified group was due to the identification of peritoneal thickening, leading to higher detection rates for mesenteric fat inflammation (100% vs. 46%), appendicitis (94% vs. 63%), and urachal inflammation (100% vs. 0%). Detection rates for substantial lesions, such as gallstones and ovarian torsion, were similar in both groups (100%). The stratified group also showed significantly better detection of gastrointestinal conditions like gastroenteritis (97% vs. 32%), inguinal hernia (100% vs. 0%), and intestinal ascariasis (100% vs. 47%). Differences in detection rates were observed when abdominal fat layer thickness was between 0.8 and 1.7 cm, with more significant differences when thickness exceeded 1.7 cm.
CONCLUSIONS: Real-time ultrasound with stratified screening effectively detects abdominal and pelvic masses, solid organ lesions, and bowel wall thickening, improving disease detection in children, including individuals with increased body mass index. This method is valuable and recommended for wider use.