European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology · 2014
Quality of life in patients with peritoneal surface malignancies after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chia C S, Tan W J, Wong J F Sze, Tan G H Ching, Lim C, Wang W, Sin E I-L, Tham C K, Soo K C, Teo M C C
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: An increasing number of patients are presenting with peritoneal carcinomatosis and more centers are performing cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). While morbidity and mortality are shown to be acceptable, quality of life after surgery should be assessed.
METHODS: 63 patients who had CRS and HIPEC from 2001 to 2012 and who were still alive and on follow up were included. The EORTC-QLQ-C30 was administered to the patients.
RESULTS: Median age was 53 years (14-71). 44% had ovarian primaries, 21% had appendicael primaries and 19% had colorectal primaries. Median follow-up was 1.08 years (0.06-9.8). The median time from surgery to the questionnaire was 1.3 years (0.24-10.18). There was no statistical difference in scores when comparing by age, gender, recurrence, gender, PCI score, presence of a complication and type of primary cancer. Scores were highest less than 6 months after surgery, dropped subsequently but rose again after 2 years. Our patients had better scores compared to a control group of outpatient cancer patients at our institution as well as the reference EORTC group.
CONCLUSIONS: In keeping with previous quality of life studies done for CRS and HIPEC patients, we have shown that our patients can achieve a good quality of life after CRS and HIPEC even with recurrent disease.
METHODS: 63 patients who had CRS and HIPEC from 2001 to 2012 and who were still alive and on follow up were included. The EORTC-QLQ-C30 was administered to the patients.
RESULTS: Median age was 53 years (14-71). 44% had ovarian primaries, 21% had appendicael primaries and 19% had colorectal primaries. Median follow-up was 1.08 years (0.06-9.8). The median time from surgery to the questionnaire was 1.3 years (0.24-10.18). There was no statistical difference in scores when comparing by age, gender, recurrence, gender, PCI score, presence of a complication and type of primary cancer. Scores were highest less than 6 months after surgery, dropped subsequently but rose again after 2 years. Our patients had better scores compared to a control group of outpatient cancer patients at our institution as well as the reference EORTC group.
CONCLUSIONS: In keeping with previous quality of life studies done for CRS and HIPEC patients, we have shown that our patients can achieve a good quality of life after CRS and HIPEC even with recurrent disease.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdolescentAdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsAppendiceal NeoplasmsChemotherapy, AdjuvantChemotherapy, Cancer, Regional PerfusionChinaColorectal NeoplasmsDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHealth StatusHumansHyperthermia, InducedIndiaMaleMiddle AgedOvarian NeoplasmsPeritoneal CavityPeritoneal NeoplasmsQuality of LifeRoleSingaporeSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment Outcome