MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology · 1996

Differentiation of low grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma by digital image processing.

Kneitz S, Ott G, Albert, Schindewolf T, Müller-Hermelink H K, Harms H

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To identify different types of low grade B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) classified according to the Revised European American Lymphoma and Kiel classification systems by means of digital image processing.

STUDY

DESIGN

Seventy-four touch imprints were scanned and analyzed. To compare common but intricate DNA stain with a routinely used panoptical dye, all lymphoma specimens had been stained by the Romanowsky-Giemsa method and 48 touch imprints redyed with Feulgen-Azure A. In both cases 30 features derived from size, and chromatin texture of each nucleus were evaluated.

RESULTS

Feulgen-stained touch imprints showed a 59% average probability of correct identification. The division of mantle cell lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia was difficult. In contrast, it was possible to distinguish all different types of lymphomas investigated if Romanowsky-Giemsa stain was used. Correct diagnoses were achieved for mantle cell lymphoma in 87.5%, follicle center cell lymphoma in 78%, chromic lymphocytic leukemia in 78%, immunocytoma in 75% and marginal zone B-cell lymphoma in 80%.

CONCLUSION

The application of texture analysis is feasible in the classification of NHL.

Для цитирования: Kneitz S, Ott G, Albert, Schindewolf T, Müller-Hermelink H K, Harms H. Differentiation of low grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma by digital image processing.. Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology. 1996.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.