Annales de chirurgie · 2005
[Cervical and upper-third thoracic oesophageal carcinoma: a single pathological entity?].
Аннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Piessen G, Mariette C, Triboulet J P
Аннотация
AIM OF THE STUDY: Cervical and upper-third thoracic oesophageal carcinomas are considered as a single pathological entity. The aim of this study was to compare postoperative and oncological results after surgical resection in these two locations.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Postoperative and oncological results were compared retrospectively in 155 patients who underwent surgery for carcinoma of the cervical (C group, n = 21) or upper-third thoracic (TS group, n = 134) oesophagus.
RESULTS: The two groups were comparable regarding the pre-, peroperative and histological data. Postoperative mortality and morbidity rates in the C and TS groups were 4.8% and 10.4% (P= 0.413) and 57.1 and 50.7% (P= 0.585), respectively. R0 resection and recurrence rates were 61.9% and 73.1% (P= 0.289) and 50.0% and 51.1% (P= 0.941), respectively. Five-year survival rates were 0% and 35% in the overall population (P= 0.098) and 0 and 49% in the R0 population (P= 0.047), respectively. By multivariate analysis, cervical location of the tumour was found to be an independent factor of poor prognosis (relative risk= 3.1, 95% confidence interval= 1.3-7.8, P= 0.014).
CONCLUSION: Prognosis after surgical resection of cervical oesophagus carcinoma is very poor. Surgery in this location should be proposed in case of chemoradiation failure.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Postoperative and oncological results were compared retrospectively in 155 patients who underwent surgery for carcinoma of the cervical (C group, n = 21) or upper-third thoracic (TS group, n = 134) oesophagus.
RESULTS: The two groups were comparable regarding the pre-, peroperative and histological data. Postoperative mortality and morbidity rates in the C and TS groups were 4.8% and 10.4% (P= 0.413) and 57.1 and 50.7% (P= 0.585), respectively. R0 resection and recurrence rates were 61.9% and 73.1% (P= 0.289) and 50.0% and 51.1% (P= 0.941), respectively. Five-year survival rates were 0% and 35% in the overall population (P= 0.098) and 0 and 49% in the R0 population (P= 0.047), respectively. By multivariate analysis, cervical location of the tumour was found to be an independent factor of poor prognosis (relative risk= 3.1, 95% confidence interval= 1.3-7.8, P= 0.014).
CONCLUSION: Prognosis after surgical resection of cervical oesophagus carcinoma is very poor. Surgery in this location should be proposed in case of chemoradiation failure.