MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/dcr.0000000000000299

Медицинская библиотека · Diseases of the colon and rectum · 2015

Restorative proctocolectomy with a handsewn IPAA: S-pouch or J-pouch?

Wu Xian-Rui, Kirat Hasan T, Kalady Matthew F, Church James M

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The efferent limb on the S-pouch fits well into the anal canal while the body of the pouch lies on the levators. In contrast, the blunt end of a J-pouch may be distorted as it is forced into the muscular tube of the stripped anus.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes and quality of life between patients with S- and J-pouches with a handsewn IPAA.

DESIGN

This study was retrospective.

SETTING

This study was conducted at a high-volume tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS: Patients undergoing a primary handsewn IPAA from 1983 to 2012 were identified.

MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Demographics, operative details, functional outcomes, and quality of life were abstracted.

RESULTS

A total of 502 patients, including 169 patients with an S-pouch (33.7%) and 333 patients with J-pouch (66.3%), met our inclusion criteria; 55.8% (n = 280) were men. Mean age at pouch construction was 37.8 ± 12.5 years. Patients with an S-pouch were younger (p = 0.004) and had a higher BMI (p = 0.035) at pouch surgery. There was no significant difference between patients with S- or J-pouches in other demographics. The frequencies of short-term complications in the 2 groups were similar (p > 0.05), but pouch fistula or sinus (p = 0.047), pelvic sepsis (p = 0.044), postoperative partial small-bowel obstruction (p = 0.003), or postoperative pouch-related hospitalization (p = 0.021) occurred in fewer patients with an S-pouch. At a median follow-up of 12.2 (range, 4.3-20.1) years, patients with an S-pouch were found to have fewer bowel movements (p < 0.001), less frequent pad use (p = 0.001), and a lower fecal incontinence severity index score (p = 0.015). The pouch failed in 62 patients (12.4%), but neither univariate nor multivariate analysis showed a significant association with pouch configuration.

LIMITATIONS: The use of data from a single tertiary referral center was a limitation of this study.

CONCLUSION

We recommend using an S-pouch when constructing an IPAA with a handsewn technique.

Для цитирования: Wu Xian-Rui, Kirat Hasan T, Kalady Matthew F, Church James M. Restorative proctocolectomy with a handsewn IPAA: S-pouch or J-pouch?. Diseases of the colon and rectum. 2015. DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000000299.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.