MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.5056/jnm14025

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility · 2015

Comparison of High-resolution Anorectal Manometry With Water-perfused Anorectal Manometry.

Kang Hye Ran, Lee Ji-Eun, Lee Joon Seong, Lee Tae Hee, Hong Su Jin, Kim Jin Oh, Jeon Seong Ran, Kim Hyun Gun

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To date, high-resolution manometry has been used mainly in the study of esophageal motility disorders and has been shown to provide more physiological information than conventional manometry, and is easier to interpret. This study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of high-resolution anorectal manometry (HRARM) compared to water-perfused anorectal manometry.

METHODS

Patients who complained of chronic constipation with/without fecal incontinence underwent both water-perfused anorectal manometry and HRARM in a random order on the same day. Resting and squeezing pressures of the anal sphincter, attempted defecation, rectoanal inhibitory reflex, rectoanal contractile reflex, Rao's type of dyssynergia during attempted defecation, anal canal length, defecation dynamic parameters and measurement times for each method were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of 14 patients, 7 were female, and the median age was 59 years (range 35-77). Indications for manometry were constipation (n = 8) and constipation with fecal incontinence (n = 6). Resting and squeezing pressures showed that the two methods were strongly correlated (resting pressure: r = 0.746, P = 0.002; squeezing pressure: r = 0.921, P < 0.001). In attempted defection, one equivocal case with water-perfused anorectal manometry was diagnosed type I pelvic floor dyssynergia with HRARM providing detailed pressure changes in internal and external anal spincters, and puborectalis muscle which improved assessment of anorectal disorders. The measurement time for HRARM was significantly shorter than that for water-perfused anorectal manometry (11.3 vs. 23.0 minutes, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Both water-perfused anorectal manometry and HRARM are well tolerated and reliable methods of evaluating defecation disorders of pelvic floor dysfunction. HRARM is likely to provide better physiological information and to require a shorter measurement time compared to water-perfused anorectal manometry.

Для цитирования: Kang Hye Ran, Lee Ji-Eun, Lee Joon Seong, Lee Tae Hee, Hong Su Jin, Kim Jin Oh, Jeon Seong Ran, Kim Hyun Gun. Comparison of High-resolution Anorectal Manometry With Water-perfused Anorectal Manometry.. Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility. 2015. DOI: 10.5056/jnm14025.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.