IJU case reports · 2023
A case of perforation of the prostatic abscess into the rectum resulting in a rectoprostatic fistula.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sugiyama Yuichi, Fujikawa Atsushi, Yokokawa Shuhei
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: A rectoprostatic fistula complicating a prostatic abscess is extremely rare, and there are many uncertainties regarding its treatment and prognosis.
CASE PRESENTATION: We present the case of a 68-year-old male who presented with rectal bleeding. Computed tomography reveals a prostatic abscess in contact with the rectum. As conservative treatment with antibiotics resulted in the aggravation of symptoms, we placed a transperineal catheter placement in the prostate, followed by drainage of the abscess through the catheter. The abscess communicated with the rectum, forming a rectoprostatic fistula. Subsequently, a transverse colostomy was performed. The abscess resolved, and no recurrence was observed even after 6 months of drainage. However, the rectal ulceration that resulted in the formation of the fistula persisted, and stoma closure was not achieved.
CONCLUSION: In cases of prostatic abscess complicated by rectoprostatic fistula, drainage of the abscess along with colostomy seems essential for a curative approach.
CASE PRESENTATION: We present the case of a 68-year-old male who presented with rectal bleeding. Computed tomography reveals a prostatic abscess in contact with the rectum. As conservative treatment with antibiotics resulted in the aggravation of symptoms, we placed a transperineal catheter placement in the prostate, followed by drainage of the abscess through the catheter. The abscess communicated with the rectum, forming a rectoprostatic fistula. Subsequently, a transverse colostomy was performed. The abscess resolved, and no recurrence was observed even after 6 months of drainage. However, the rectal ulceration that resulted in the formation of the fistula persisted, and stoma closure was not achieved.
CONCLUSION: In cases of prostatic abscess complicated by rectoprostatic fistula, drainage of the abscess along with colostomy seems essential for a curative approach.