Zhonghua kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Zhonghua kouqiang yixue zazhi = Chinese journal of stomatology · 2007
[A preliminary study of head and neck reconstruction using free anterolateral thigh flap].
Аннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Mao Chi, Liu Xin-hua, Peng Xin, Zhang Lei, Yu Guang-yan, Guo Chuan-bin
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the feasibility and reliability of free anterolateral thigh flap transfers in head and neck reconstruction.
METHODS: Twenty-two consecutive free anterolateral thigh flap transfers from January 2002 to January 2006 were reviewed. Data concerning the operation included date of surgery, defect description and site, stage and histology of tumor, design of anterolateral free flap, type of perforators, recipient vessel and type of anastomosis used and complications.
RESULTS: There were 13 males and 9 females in this group, with age range of 35 to 70. Among 26 perforators, there were 6 septocutaneous perforators and 20 musculocutaneous perforators. One flap developed venous thrombosis 48 hours after operation, and the flap was removed after failed salvage. No vessel thrombosis occurred during and after operation with other flaps, which survived completely. All the donor sites were closed directly without skin graft. Apart from one case, all the donor sites healed uneventfully.
CONCLUSIONS: Free anterolateral thigh flap is a safe and reliable donor site in the reconstruction of head and neck defects. It overcomes the shortcomings of traditional free radial forearm flap and free rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap.
METHODS: Twenty-two consecutive free anterolateral thigh flap transfers from January 2002 to January 2006 were reviewed. Data concerning the operation included date of surgery, defect description and site, stage and histology of tumor, design of anterolateral free flap, type of perforators, recipient vessel and type of anastomosis used and complications.
RESULTS: There were 13 males and 9 females in this group, with age range of 35 to 70. Among 26 perforators, there were 6 septocutaneous perforators and 20 musculocutaneous perforators. One flap developed venous thrombosis 48 hours after operation, and the flap was removed after failed salvage. No vessel thrombosis occurred during and after operation with other flaps, which survived completely. All the donor sites were closed directly without skin graft. Apart from one case, all the donor sites healed uneventfully.
CONCLUSIONS: Free anterolateral thigh flap is a safe and reliable donor site in the reconstruction of head and neck defects. It overcomes the shortcomings of traditional free radial forearm flap and free rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap.