European annals of otorhinolaryngology, head and neck diseases · 2020
Swallowing difficulties caused by a voice prosthesis in a laryngectomee.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Brook I, Cord L, Orestes M, Davidson B
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: The role of voice prosthesis (VP) in causing swallowing difficulties has not been thoroughly evaluated. A laryngectomee with dysphasia caused by a VP is presented.
CASE REPORT: A 77-year-old laryngectomee presented with dysphagia. He had hypo pharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma, which was treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy 13 years earlier. Cancer recurrence 2 years later required laryngectomy and forearm free flap restoration. The patient used trachea-oesophageal speech for communication using Provox® Vega 22.5/Fr 6mm. Diagnostic endoscopy revealed significant oesophageal stenosis at the upper portion of the flap immediately below the VP. The VP was replaced with a 22.5 Fr/4mm Provox® Vega that was modified by cutting out its distal hood that protruded into the oesophageal lumen. The patient noted an immediate improvement in his dysphagia that persisted through the 14-month follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: This report underscores the need to evaluate the role of VP in laryngectomees with swallowing difficulties. Obstruction generated by oesophageal protrusion of the VP can be alleviated by installing a thinner prosthesis and/or when possible by changing the location of the puncture to a new site.
CASE REPORT: A 77-year-old laryngectomee presented with dysphagia. He had hypo pharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma, which was treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy 13 years earlier. Cancer recurrence 2 years later required laryngectomy and forearm free flap restoration. The patient used trachea-oesophageal speech for communication using Provox® Vega 22.5/Fr 6mm. Diagnostic endoscopy revealed significant oesophageal stenosis at the upper portion of the flap immediately below the VP. The VP was replaced with a 22.5 Fr/4mm Provox® Vega that was modified by cutting out its distal hood that protruded into the oesophageal lumen. The patient noted an immediate improvement in his dysphagia that persisted through the 14-month follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: This report underscores the need to evaluate the role of VP in laryngectomees with swallowing difficulties. Obstruction generated by oesophageal protrusion of the VP can be alleviated by installing a thinner prosthesis and/or when possible by changing the location of the puncture to a new site.