Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2016
Correction of collimator-dependent differences in the heart-to-mediastinum ratio in 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine cardiac sympathetic imaging: Determination of conversion equations using point-source imaging.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Inoue Yusuke, Abe Yutaka, Kikuchi Kei, Matsunaga Keiji, Masuda Ray, Nishiyama Kazutoshi
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Septal penetration causes collimator-dependent differences in the heart-to-mediastinum (H/M) ratio in 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) cardiac imaging. We investigated generally applicable methods to correct such differences.
METHODS AND RESULTS: Four hours after 123I-MIBG injection, 40 patients underwent anterior chest imaging successively with medium-energy (ME) and various non-ME collimators. The H/M ratios obtained with the non-ME collimators before and after 123I-dual-window penetration correction were compared with the ME-derived standard values to determine patient-based conversion equations for empiric and combined corrections, respectively. A 123I point source was imaged with various collimators, and the central ratio, the ratio of count in a small central region of interest to count in a large one, was calculated. The method of predicting the conversion equations from the central ratios was determined. Correction using the patient-based conversion equations removed systematic underestimation of the H/M ratios obtained with the non-ME collimators, and combined correction depressed residual random errors to some degree. Point-source-based equations yielded results comparable to the patient-based equations.
CONCLUSIONS: Empiric and combined corrections effectively reduce collimator-dependent differences in the H/M ratio. The conversion equations can be predicted from simple point-source imaging, which would allow to apply these corrections to data obtained with various collimators.
METHODS AND RESULTS: Four hours after 123I-MIBG injection, 40 patients underwent anterior chest imaging successively with medium-energy (ME) and various non-ME collimators. The H/M ratios obtained with the non-ME collimators before and after 123I-dual-window penetration correction were compared with the ME-derived standard values to determine patient-based conversion equations for empiric and combined corrections, respectively. A 123I point source was imaged with various collimators, and the central ratio, the ratio of count in a small central region of interest to count in a large one, was calculated. The method of predicting the conversion equations from the central ratios was determined. Correction using the patient-based conversion equations removed systematic underestimation of the H/M ratios obtained with the non-ME collimators, and combined correction depressed residual random errors to some degree. Point-source-based equations yielded results comparable to the patient-based equations.
CONCLUSIONS: Empiric and combined corrections effectively reduce collimator-dependent differences in the H/M ratio. The conversion equations can be predicted from simple point-source imaging, which would allow to apply these corrections to data obtained with various collimators.