Akusherstvo i ginekologiia · 2013
[Our and foreign experience in modern surgical treatment of cervical adenocarcinoma stage T(1A1)].
Аннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ivanov S, Kornovski J, Kovachev E, Hinev A, Tzonev A, Ismail E, Slavchev St, Abudd A
Аннотация
AIM: The aim of this research work was to evaluate the distant results in patients with cervical adenocarcinoma stage T(1A1) treated conservatively only by conization.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: 60 patients were) examined for 10 years period with cervical adenocarcinoma stage T(1A1) (stromal invasion to 3 mm in deapth and 7 mm horizontal spread).
RESULTS: 50 patients were surgicaly treated by cold knife conization and 10 patients by LLETZ. In 40 patients a total hysterectomy was additionally performed. 20 patients (age range from 20 to 40 years) were treated only by conization because they desired to preserve fertility. In 12 patients an attempt was made for to get pregnant. In 7 patients there was a successful pregnancy.
CONCLUSIONS: The conization of the uterine cervix as the only treatment in patients with cervical cancer T(1A1) adenocarcinoma is effective and safe therapy. It is very important when patients desire to save their reproductive functions. The individualization of this treatment method is not yet obligatory because of the small number of treated patients.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: 60 patients were) examined for 10 years period with cervical adenocarcinoma stage T(1A1) (stromal invasion to 3 mm in deapth and 7 mm horizontal spread).
RESULTS: 50 patients were surgicaly treated by cold knife conization and 10 patients by LLETZ. In 40 patients a total hysterectomy was additionally performed. 20 patients (age range from 20 to 40 years) were treated only by conization because they desired to preserve fertility. In 12 patients an attempt was made for to get pregnant. In 7 patients there was a successful pregnancy.
CONCLUSIONS: The conization of the uterine cervix as the only treatment in patients with cervical cancer T(1A1) adenocarcinoma is effective and safe therapy. It is very important when patients desire to save their reproductive functions. The individualization of this treatment method is not yet obligatory because of the small number of treated patients.