The journal of spinal cord medicine · 2025
Use of clinical prediction rules after spinal cord injury to guide early locomotor training.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Arnold Dannae, Campbell Jillian, Ochoa Christa, Gilliland Taylor, Bennett Monica, Johnson Jack, Sikka Seema, Swank Chad
Аннотация
CONTEXT: Determining walking prognosis during early recovery phases after spinal cord injury (SCI) is challenging.
OBJECTIVE: We retrospectively examined the use of clinical prediction rules (CPRs) for a cohort of patients with SCI undergoing locomotor training during inpatient rehabilitation.
METHODS: Patients participating in a randomized controlled trial received overground robotic exoskeleton (ORE) or usual care (UC) locomotor training during inpatient rehabilitation. Patient data extracted from the medical record (Admission ISNCSCI scores, age) were utilized to populate each of three CPRs. Admission and discharge Walking Index for spinal cord injury-II (WISCI-II) and CARE Tool (walking) items characterized walking ability.
RESULTS: Eighty-nine inpatients with SCI [AIS B (20%), C (28%), and D (52%)] were included [males (79%), median age 56 years (IQR: 33, 66), tetraplegic (61%), median time since injury 23 days (17, 42) and median length of stay 36 days (28, 54)]. Accuracy of walking prediction by the CPRs was 71.9%, with 55.4% specificity and 100% sensitivity. Fifty-eight patients were predicted to walk independently 1-year post-injury, with the 33 (56.9%) walking independently by inpatient rehabilitation discharge [ORE (AIS C = 4, AIS D = 19) vs. UC (AIS D = 10)] being younger [median age = 46 vs. 62, P = 0.042], shorter time from injury to first locomotor training [median days = 29 vs. 40, p = 0.001], AIS D [88% vs. 54%, p = 0.009], and higher admission WISCI-II and CARE Tool scores [p < 0.05].
CONCLUSIONS: Integration of CPRs into clinical practice appears to differentiate those with higher versus lower walking potential and may guide therapists to better prioritize locomotor interventions earlier in recovery.
OBJECTIVE: We retrospectively examined the use of clinical prediction rules (CPRs) for a cohort of patients with SCI undergoing locomotor training during inpatient rehabilitation.
METHODS: Patients participating in a randomized controlled trial received overground robotic exoskeleton (ORE) or usual care (UC) locomotor training during inpatient rehabilitation. Patient data extracted from the medical record (Admission ISNCSCI scores, age) were utilized to populate each of three CPRs. Admission and discharge Walking Index for spinal cord injury-II (WISCI-II) and CARE Tool (walking) items characterized walking ability.
RESULTS: Eighty-nine inpatients with SCI [AIS B (20%), C (28%), and D (52%)] were included [males (79%), median age 56 years (IQR: 33, 66), tetraplegic (61%), median time since injury 23 days (17, 42) and median length of stay 36 days (28, 54)]. Accuracy of walking prediction by the CPRs was 71.9%, with 55.4% specificity and 100% sensitivity. Fifty-eight patients were predicted to walk independently 1-year post-injury, with the 33 (56.9%) walking independently by inpatient rehabilitation discharge [ORE (AIS C = 4, AIS D = 19) vs. UC (AIS D = 10)] being younger [median age = 46 vs. 62, P = 0.042], shorter time from injury to first locomotor training [median days = 29 vs. 40, p = 0.001], AIS D [88% vs. 54%, p = 0.009], and higher admission WISCI-II and CARE Tool scores [p < 0.05].
CONCLUSIONS: Integration of CPRs into clinical practice appears to differentiate those with higher versus lower walking potential and may guide therapists to better prioritize locomotor interventions earlier in recovery.