European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology · 2018
Ureteral injuries during different types of hysterecomy: A 7-year series at a single university center.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Barbic Matija, Telenta Kalina, Noventa Marco, Blaganje Mija
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Accidental ureteral injury with gynaecologic surgery, especially hysterectomy, represents a high risk of patient morbidity. The incidence may vary from centre to centre. As the introduction of new minimally invasive surgical techniques and instruments may have affected the incidence of ureteral injury, we de novo analysed the incidence data for the last seven years.
STUDY DESIGN: Incidence of ureteral injury was analysed stratifying the data according to the type of hysterectomy (n = 3071). The incidence rate was reported as a confidence interval (CI). Ureteral injuries were classified as direct or indirect.
RESULTS: Fifteen ureteral injuries were registered. The highest incidence was evidenced for radical hysterectomy (CI: 0.82-3.99), followed by laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (CI: 0-11.9). The incidence of direct ureteral injury was 26.6%, half of which were identified during the operative procedure. In 26.7% of the operations resulting in ureteral injury, heat-generating instruments were used.
CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of ureteral injury during different types of hysterectomy was low. The majority of injuries were indirect. These were injuries which resulted from a micro-trauma, and developed due to the delayed necrosis of the ureteral wall. Laparoscopic approach to radical and simple hysterectomy didn't substantially raise the incidence of ureteral injury.
STUDY DESIGN: Incidence of ureteral injury was analysed stratifying the data according to the type of hysterectomy (n = 3071). The incidence rate was reported as a confidence interval (CI). Ureteral injuries were classified as direct or indirect.
RESULTS: Fifteen ureteral injuries were registered. The highest incidence was evidenced for radical hysterectomy (CI: 0.82-3.99), followed by laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (CI: 0-11.9). The incidence of direct ureteral injury was 26.6%, half of which were identified during the operative procedure. In 26.7% of the operations resulting in ureteral injury, heat-generating instruments were used.
CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of ureteral injury during different types of hysterectomy was low. The majority of injuries were indirect. These were injuries which resulted from a micro-trauma, and developed due to the delayed necrosis of the ureteral wall. Laparoscopic approach to radical and simple hysterectomy didn't substantially raise the incidence of ureteral injury.