Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2026
Machine Learning-Based Classification of BI-RADS 4 and BI-RADS 5 Microcalcifications in Mammography Combined with DCE-MRI for Malignant-Benign Discrimination.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ünal Sevgi, Açıkgözoğlu Enes
Аннотация
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Breast cancer remains one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality among women worldwide. Early and accurate characterization of suspicious mammographic microcalcifications is essential for improving diagnostic decision-making and reducing unnecessary invasive procedures. Microcalcifications classified as BI-RADS 4 and BI-RADS 5 are clinically important radiological findings; however, differentiating benign from malignant lesions remains challenging because of overlapping morphological and distribution patterns. This study aimed to develop a structured feature-based machine learning model for predicting the pathological diagnosis of breast microcalcifications by integrating mammographic descriptors, patient age, and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) contrast enhancement findings.
METHODS: The dataset included 53 biopsy-confirmed cases and consisted of clinical and radiological variables, including patient age, calcification morphology, calcification size, distribution pattern, DCE-MRI contrast enhancement status, and histopathological outcome. Several conventional machine learning algorithms were evaluated, including Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine with radial basis function kernel, K-Nearest Neighbors, Decision Tree, Random Forest, Extra Trees, Gradient Boosting, AdaBoost, and CatBoost. Hyperparameter optimization was performed using grid search with five-fold cross-validation. Model performance was assessed using accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, ROC-AUC, and log loss.
RESULTS: Logistic Regression achieved the highest overall performance, with an accuracy of 0.909 and an F1-score of 0.889, while AdaBoost achieved a recall of 1.000 in the internal evaluation. However, given the limited sample size and lack of external validation, these findings should be interpreted as preliminary.
CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that structured radiological descriptors combined with DCE-MRI enhancement information may support malignancy risk stratification of BI-RADS 4-5 microcalcifications, although larger multicenter studies are required before clinical implementation.
METHODS: The dataset included 53 biopsy-confirmed cases and consisted of clinical and radiological variables, including patient age, calcification morphology, calcification size, distribution pattern, DCE-MRI contrast enhancement status, and histopathological outcome. Several conventional machine learning algorithms were evaluated, including Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine with radial basis function kernel, K-Nearest Neighbors, Decision Tree, Random Forest, Extra Trees, Gradient Boosting, AdaBoost, and CatBoost. Hyperparameter optimization was performed using grid search with five-fold cross-validation. Model performance was assessed using accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, ROC-AUC, and log loss.
RESULTS: Logistic Regression achieved the highest overall performance, with an accuracy of 0.909 and an F1-score of 0.889, while AdaBoost achieved a recall of 1.000 in the internal evaluation. However, given the limited sample size and lack of external validation, these findings should be interpreted as preliminary.
CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that structured radiological descriptors combined with DCE-MRI enhancement information may support malignancy risk stratification of BI-RADS 4-5 microcalcifications, although larger multicenter studies are required before clinical implementation.