The Journal of surgical research · 2026
Leading Beyond the Operating Room: Reimagining Leadership Pathways in Academic Surgery.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Fackche Nadege T, Fayanju Oluwadamilola M, Wang Tracy S, Nussbaum Michael S, Waer Amy L, Higgins Robert S D, Foretia Denis A
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Despite growing recognition that surgical excellence does not automatically confer leadership competence, formal preparation for administrative and organizational roles remains inconsistently embedded across surgical training and early faculty careers. This review examines the core competency domains required for effective surgical leadership, situates them within the contemporary evidence base, and offers a framework for deliberate leadership development across career stages.
METHODS: This review synthesizes insights from a moderated expert panel convened at the 2026 Academic Surgical Congress Annual Meeting and situates it within the peer-reviewed literature on surgical and physician leadership development. Five senior academic leaders, including department chairs, division chiefs, vice chairs for faculty development, medical school deans, and a university president, participated in the panel. Editorial analysis of the panel transcript identified competency domains, which were cross-referenced with published evidence.
RESULTS: Six leadership competency domains emerged: (1) incremental, competency-based leadership development beginning early in training; (2) delegation as a discrete and teachable skill that is systematically underdeveloped in surgeons; (3) the distinct and complementary roles of mentorship and sponsorship in career advancement; (4) influence and authority in matrixed health systems where positional power is partial; (5) emotional intelligence and a reflective feedback culture as pillars of leadership longevity; and (6) financial literacy as a neglected but essential competency for senior administrative roles.
CONCLUSIONS: The competencies required for effective surgical leadership are learnable, but they must be deliberately cultivated across career stages. Individuals, training programs, and institutions each bear distinct responsibilities in building a more capable and equitable leadership pipeline. Closing the current preparation gap requires structural intervention at the curricular, departmental, and institutional levels.
METHODS: This review synthesizes insights from a moderated expert panel convened at the 2026 Academic Surgical Congress Annual Meeting and situates it within the peer-reviewed literature on surgical and physician leadership development. Five senior academic leaders, including department chairs, division chiefs, vice chairs for faculty development, medical school deans, and a university president, participated in the panel. Editorial analysis of the panel transcript identified competency domains, which were cross-referenced with published evidence.
RESULTS: Six leadership competency domains emerged: (1) incremental, competency-based leadership development beginning early in training; (2) delegation as a discrete and teachable skill that is systematically underdeveloped in surgeons; (3) the distinct and complementary roles of mentorship and sponsorship in career advancement; (4) influence and authority in matrixed health systems where positional power is partial; (5) emotional intelligence and a reflective feedback culture as pillars of leadership longevity; and (6) financial literacy as a neglected but essential competency for senior administrative roles.
CONCLUSIONS: The competencies required for effective surgical leadership are learnable, but they must be deliberately cultivated across career stages. Individuals, training programs, and institutions each bear distinct responsibilities in building a more capable and equitable leadership pipeline. Closing the current preparation gap requires structural intervention at the curricular, departmental, and institutional levels.