Urology · 2017
P.L.E.A.T.-Preventing Lymphocele Ensuring Absorption Transperitoneally: A Robotic Technique.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Dal Moro Fabrizio, Zattoni Filiberto
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To reduce the risk of symptomatic lymphocele after robotic pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND), we present a technique, preventing lymphocele ensuring absorption transperitoneally (P.L.E.A.T.), where the peritoneum is "pleated" along its midline, leaving 2 lateral openings and allowing lymphatic fluid to drain away from the pelvis and into the abdomen.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed a single-surgeon series of PLNDs during robotic radical prostatectomy, comparing 195 "standard" PLNDs (in which the peritoneum was "re-approximated" or left completely open) with 176 cases in which P.L.E.A.T. was performed.
RESULTS: In the group without P.L.E.A.T., 8 cases of symptomatic (grade ≥3, according to the Clavien-Dindo Classification) lymphoceles (4.1%) were recorded. Only 1 patient in the P.L.E.A.T. group complained of symptoms because of a lymphocele (P = .039). No patient reported complications because of the procedure.
CONCLUSION: The P.L.E.A.T. technique is a fast, easy-to-perform, and safe method of reducing the risk of symptomatic lymphocele after transperitoneal robotic PLND.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed a single-surgeon series of PLNDs during robotic radical prostatectomy, comparing 195 "standard" PLNDs (in which the peritoneum was "re-approximated" or left completely open) with 176 cases in which P.L.E.A.T. was performed.
RESULTS: In the group without P.L.E.A.T., 8 cases of symptomatic (grade ≥3, according to the Clavien-Dindo Classification) lymphoceles (4.1%) were recorded. Only 1 patient in the P.L.E.A.T. group complained of symptoms because of a lymphocele (P = .039). No patient reported complications because of the procedure.
CONCLUSION: The P.L.E.A.T. technique is a fast, easy-to-perform, and safe method of reducing the risk of symptomatic lymphocele after transperitoneal robotic PLND.