Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques · 2015
One-port videothoracoscopic surgical intervention.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kiral Hakan, Tezel Cagatay, Ocakcioglu İlhan, Vayvada Mustafa, Bayram Serkan, Urek Senol, Alpay Levent
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: One-port video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) has recently been proposed as an alternative to conventional 3-port VATS. To reduce pain, chest wall paresthesia, and hospital stay, lesser ports are the current direction.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2007 to 2010, 98 patients underwent 1-port VATS procedure. The charts were retrospectively evaluated. A 2.5 cm long incision was made at the sixth intercostal space in the median axillary line. A single flexible port was used. Both the camera and the endoinstruments were introduced through the port. Patient characteristics, visual analog score, and postoperative paresthesia scores were evaluated.
RESULTS: The study enrolled 38 women and 60 men with the mean age of 49.1±1.5 years (range, 19 to 75 y). Thirty-one patients (28.6%) were diagnosed with malignant pleural effusion. Perioperative pleurodesis with talc was performed in 81% of them. One-port VATS approach was used for pleura biopsies in 77 (78.6%), wedge resection in 4 (3.8%), pleurectomy in 13 (12.4%), and biopsy with talc chemical pleurodesis in 4 (3.8%) instances. The mean operation time was 24.4 minutes (range, 15 to 50 min). No major cardiorespiratory or surgical complications were noted. The median observation time was 60 months (range, 36±81 mo). Among benign pathology patients, 56 (82.3%) of them did not complain about any pain; however, 12 patients had prolonged discomfort (2 pinprick, 6 numbness, and 4 pruritus).
CONCLUSIONS: One-port VATS in selected patients are feasible and seems to be safe in thoracic surgical interventions instead of conventional 3 ports that was presented in this series.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2007 to 2010, 98 patients underwent 1-port VATS procedure. The charts were retrospectively evaluated. A 2.5 cm long incision was made at the sixth intercostal space in the median axillary line. A single flexible port was used. Both the camera and the endoinstruments were introduced through the port. Patient characteristics, visual analog score, and postoperative paresthesia scores were evaluated.
RESULTS: The study enrolled 38 women and 60 men with the mean age of 49.1±1.5 years (range, 19 to 75 y). Thirty-one patients (28.6%) were diagnosed with malignant pleural effusion. Perioperative pleurodesis with talc was performed in 81% of them. One-port VATS approach was used for pleura biopsies in 77 (78.6%), wedge resection in 4 (3.8%), pleurectomy in 13 (12.4%), and biopsy with talc chemical pleurodesis in 4 (3.8%) instances. The mean operation time was 24.4 minutes (range, 15 to 50 min). No major cardiorespiratory or surgical complications were noted. The median observation time was 60 months (range, 36±81 mo). Among benign pathology patients, 56 (82.3%) of them did not complain about any pain; however, 12 patients had prolonged discomfort (2 pinprick, 6 numbness, and 4 pruritus).
CONCLUSIONS: One-port VATS in selected patients are feasible and seems to be safe in thoracic surgical interventions instead of conventional 3 ports that was presented in this series.