Folia medica · 2018
Budgetary Impact of Medicinal Therapies for Rare Diseases in Bulgaria.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Iskrov Georgi G, Jakovljevic Mihajlo Michael, Stefanov Rumen S
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Rare diseases have been continually outlined as one of the causes for the National Health Insurance Fund's (NHIF) deficit spending in Bulgaria.
AIM: To estimate the budgetary impact of rare disease medicinal therapies from NHIF perspective for 2014 and 2016.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Budgetary impact of rare diseases is calculated as a percentage of NHIF total pharmaceutical spending. Total expenditure per ICD-10 code, mean annual number of patients reimbursed and mean annual cost per patient are analysed.
RESULTS: Budgetary impact of rare diseases reached a plateau of about 9% of NHIF total pharmaceutical spending for 2014-2016. Mean number of patients reimbursed and mean annual cost per patient increased by median rates of 4.27% and 2.54%, respectively. Glycogen storage disease, neuropathic heredofamilial amyloidosis and C1 esterase inhibitor deficiency stood out, as they had the second, fourth and fifth most expensive medicinal treatment cost. While accounting for only 92 patients in 2016, these three conditions contributed for 22.89% of NHIF total expenditure on rare disease medicinal therapies. For comparison, coagulation defects, with the biggest total cost per indication, had a similar budgetary impact - 24.88%, but for 277 patients reimbursed.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study does not support the concerns about uncontrolled growth of expenditures for rare disease medicinal therapies. Nevertheless, there is a need for enhanced post-marketing surveillance and performance-based payment of these treatments. Development, collection and analysis of local real-world data have been increasingly applied as a tool to advance these health policy goals.
AIM: To estimate the budgetary impact of rare disease medicinal therapies from NHIF perspective for 2014 and 2016.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Budgetary impact of rare diseases is calculated as a percentage of NHIF total pharmaceutical spending. Total expenditure per ICD-10 code, mean annual number of patients reimbursed and mean annual cost per patient are analysed.
RESULTS: Budgetary impact of rare diseases reached a plateau of about 9% of NHIF total pharmaceutical spending for 2014-2016. Mean number of patients reimbursed and mean annual cost per patient increased by median rates of 4.27% and 2.54%, respectively. Glycogen storage disease, neuropathic heredofamilial amyloidosis and C1 esterase inhibitor deficiency stood out, as they had the second, fourth and fifth most expensive medicinal treatment cost. While accounting for only 92 patients in 2016, these three conditions contributed for 22.89% of NHIF total expenditure on rare disease medicinal therapies. For comparison, coagulation defects, with the biggest total cost per indication, had a similar budgetary impact - 24.88%, but for 277 patients reimbursed.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study does not support the concerns about uncontrolled growth of expenditures for rare disease medicinal therapies. Nevertheless, there is a need for enhanced post-marketing surveillance and performance-based payment of these treatments. Development, collection and analysis of local real-world data have been increasingly applied as a tool to advance these health policy goals.