MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1093/bja/73.4.559

Медицинская библиотека · British journal of anaesthesia · 1994

Postal survey of paediatric practice and training among consultant anaesthetists in the UK.

Stoddart P A, Brennan L, Hatch D J, Bingham R

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

A postal survey of previous paediatric anaesthetic training, current paediatric experience and management of an infant pyloromyotomy was undertaken among consultant anaesthetists in the UK. A total of 851 questionnaires were returned, giving a response rate of 31%; 352 (41%) consultants had at least one paediatric list each week, 180 (21%) anaesthetized more than one infant less than 6 months old each month and 373 (44%) had obtained more than 6 months' specialist training. Consultants trained most recently had received significantly longer (P < 0.001) specialist training than their senior colleagues: 558 (66%) consultants dealt with infants requiring a pyloromyotomy, 348 with one or two cases annually. Two-thirds preferred to use an i.v. induction technique and less than half used cricoid pressure. Choice of technique was related to the duration of specialist paediatric training and when it was received, but not to current paediatric anaesthetic experience. The results are discussed in relation to recently published recommendations on paediatric anaesthetic services.

Для цитирования: Stoddart P A, Brennan L, Hatch D J, Bingham R. Postal survey of paediatric practice and training among consultant anaesthetists in the UK.. British journal of anaesthesia. 1994. DOI: 10.1093/bja/73.4.559.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.