Magnetic resonance imaging · 2025
Characterization of the evaluation method for hepatobiliary phase image by liver magnetic resonance imaging using Gd-EOB-DTPA.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Takatsu Yasuo, Harada Shohei, Yamatani Yuya, Fukuzawa Kei, Nakamura Masafumi, Takano Kazuki, Miyati Tosiaki
Аннотация
PURPOSE: This study aimed to characterize quantitative liver-spleen contrast (Q-LSC) and hepatocellular uptake index (HUI) for evaluating hepatobiliary phase (HBP) images using gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA) in liver magnetic resonance imaging and to identify differences in the results obtain from these two measurement methods.
METHODS: Twenty-nine consecutive randomly selected patients were assessed using the 3.0 T MR system. Three regions of interest (ROI) were set for the liver parenchyma and spleen, and signal intensity (SI) was averaged. Q-LSC (SI of the liver divided by the SI of the spleen) and HUI [(Q-LSC-1) × liver volume] were calculated. Moreover, the volume and mean SI of the whole liver and spleen, left lateral segment (LLS), and the other segments were calculated. Subsequently, ROI-based and volume-based values for Q-LSC (R-LSC and V-LSC) and HUI (R-HUI and V-HUI), and the whole and each segment were compared.
RESULTS: R-LSC and V-LSC for the whole and each segment were not significantly different. Conversely, all combinations of HUI, except between R-HUI and V-HUI were significantly different (P < 0.01), for the whole liver. Correlations between R-LSC, R-HUI, and volume-based LLS were lower than the others.
CONCLUSION: Q-LSC and HUI were characterized through an imaging evaluation of HBP with Gd-EOB-DTPA. R-LSC and R-HUI, or V-HUI, of the whole liver were strongly correlated, but the LLS affected the data, and HUI depends on liver volume. R-LSC is simple and easy to use for HBP evaluation.
METHODS: Twenty-nine consecutive randomly selected patients were assessed using the 3.0 T MR system. Three regions of interest (ROI) were set for the liver parenchyma and spleen, and signal intensity (SI) was averaged. Q-LSC (SI of the liver divided by the SI of the spleen) and HUI [(Q-LSC-1) × liver volume] were calculated. Moreover, the volume and mean SI of the whole liver and spleen, left lateral segment (LLS), and the other segments were calculated. Subsequently, ROI-based and volume-based values for Q-LSC (R-LSC and V-LSC) and HUI (R-HUI and V-HUI), and the whole and each segment were compared.
RESULTS: R-LSC and V-LSC for the whole and each segment were not significantly different. Conversely, all combinations of HUI, except between R-HUI and V-HUI were significantly different (P < 0.01), for the whole liver. Correlations between R-LSC, R-HUI, and volume-based LLS were lower than the others.
CONCLUSION: Q-LSC and HUI were characterized through an imaging evaluation of HBP with Gd-EOB-DTPA. R-LSC and R-HUI, or V-HUI, of the whole liver were strongly correlated, but the LLS affected the data, and HUI depends on liver volume. R-LSC is simple and easy to use for HBP evaluation.