Diagnostic and interventional imaging · 2020
Optimization of acquisition parameters for reduced-dose thoracic CT: A phantom study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Martini K, Moon J W, Revel M P, Dangeard S, Ruan C, Chassagnon G
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to analyze the impact of different options for reduced-dose computed tomography (CT) on image noise and visibility of pulmonary structures in order to define the best choice of parameters when performing ultra-low dose acquisitions of the chest in clinical routine.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using an anthropomorphic chest phantom, CT images were acquired at four defined low dose levels (computed tomography dose index [CTDIvol]=0.15, 0.20, 0.30 and 0.40mGy), by changing tube voltage, pitch factor, or rotation time and adapting tube current to reach the predefined CTDIvol-values. Images were reconstructed using two different levels of iteration (adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction [ASIR®]-v70% and ASIR®-v100%). Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) as well as contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was calculated. Visibility of pulmonary structures (bronchi/vessels) were assessed by two readers on a 5-point-Likert scale.
RESULTS: Best visual image assessments and CNR/SNR were obtained with high tube voltage, while lowest scores were reached with lower pitch factor followed by high tube current. Protocols favoring lower pitch factor resulted in decreased visibility of bronchi/vessels, especially in the periphery. Decreasing radiation dose from 0.40 to 0.30mGy was not associated with a significant decrease in visual scores (P<0.05), however decreasing radiation dose from 0.30mGy to 0.15mGy was associated with a lower visibility of most of the evaluated structures (P<0.001). While image noise could be significantly reduced when ASIR®-v100% instead of ASIR®-v70% was used, the visibility-scores of pulmonary structures did not change significantly.
CONCLUSION: Favoring high tube voltage is the best option for reduced-dose protocols. A decrease of SNR and CNR does not necessarily go along with reduced visibility of pulmonary structures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using an anthropomorphic chest phantom, CT images were acquired at four defined low dose levels (computed tomography dose index [CTDIvol]=0.15, 0.20, 0.30 and 0.40mGy), by changing tube voltage, pitch factor, or rotation time and adapting tube current to reach the predefined CTDIvol-values. Images were reconstructed using two different levels of iteration (adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction [ASIR®]-v70% and ASIR®-v100%). Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) as well as contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was calculated. Visibility of pulmonary structures (bronchi/vessels) were assessed by two readers on a 5-point-Likert scale.
RESULTS: Best visual image assessments and CNR/SNR were obtained with high tube voltage, while lowest scores were reached with lower pitch factor followed by high tube current. Protocols favoring lower pitch factor resulted in decreased visibility of bronchi/vessels, especially in the periphery. Decreasing radiation dose from 0.40 to 0.30mGy was not associated with a significant decrease in visual scores (P<0.05), however decreasing radiation dose from 0.30mGy to 0.15mGy was associated with a lower visibility of most of the evaluated structures (P<0.001). While image noise could be significantly reduced when ASIR®-v100% instead of ASIR®-v70% was used, the visibility-scores of pulmonary structures did not change significantly.
CONCLUSION: Favoring high tube voltage is the best option for reduced-dose protocols. A decrease of SNR and CNR does not necessarily go along with reduced visibility of pulmonary structures.