Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 1996
Cricoid pressure impedes positioning and ventilation through the laryngeal mask airway.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Aoyama K, Takenaka I, Sata T, Shigematsu A
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To assess the effect of cricoid pressure on the positioning of and ventilation through the laryngeal mask airway (LMA).
METHODS: In a double-blind, randomized design, the LMA was inserted with (CP[+] group, n = 20) or without double-handed cricoid pressure (CP[-] group, n = 20). Ventilation through the LMA was assessed by measuring expiratory tidal volume and judged as adequate when a mean expiratory tidal volume of > or = 10 ml.kg-1 could be obtained. The LMA position was examined by fibreoscopy. The position of the mask relative to the cricoid cartilage and the cervical spine was radiologically examined (n = 10 in each group).
RESULTS: Ventilation was adequate in all patients in the CP[-] group but in only five patients (25%) of the CP[+] group (P < 0.001). The glottis was visible fibreoptically below the mask aperture in all patients in the CP[-] group, but in only three patients in the CP[+] group (P < 0.001). Fibreoscopy showed that the mask was not inserted far enough in the remaining 17 patients of the CP[+] group. The reason for unsuccessful ventilation in the CP[+] group was excessive gas leakage (n = 2) and/or partial or complete airway obstruction (n = 13), which was noted fibreoptically. The radiographs showed that the tip of the mask in the CP[-] group was located below the level of the cricoid cartilage (C6 or C7 vertebra). The mask tip in the CP[+] group was above this level (C4 or C5 vertebra) (P < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: Cricoid pressure impedes positioning of and ventilation through the LMA.
METHODS: In a double-blind, randomized design, the LMA was inserted with (CP[+] group, n = 20) or without double-handed cricoid pressure (CP[-] group, n = 20). Ventilation through the LMA was assessed by measuring expiratory tidal volume and judged as adequate when a mean expiratory tidal volume of > or = 10 ml.kg-1 could be obtained. The LMA position was examined by fibreoscopy. The position of the mask relative to the cricoid cartilage and the cervical spine was radiologically examined (n = 10 in each group).
RESULTS: Ventilation was adequate in all patients in the CP[-] group but in only five patients (25%) of the CP[+] group (P < 0.001). The glottis was visible fibreoptically below the mask aperture in all patients in the CP[-] group, but in only three patients in the CP[+] group (P < 0.001). Fibreoscopy showed that the mask was not inserted far enough in the remaining 17 patients of the CP[+] group. The reason for unsuccessful ventilation in the CP[+] group was excessive gas leakage (n = 2) and/or partial or complete airway obstruction (n = 13), which was noted fibreoptically. The radiographs showed that the tip of the mask in the CP[-] group was located below the level of the cricoid cartilage (C6 or C7 vertebra). The mask tip in the CP[+] group was above this level (C4 or C5 vertebra) (P < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: Cricoid pressure impedes positioning of and ventilation through the LMA.