MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/hed.23341

Медицинская библиотека · Head & neck · 2013

Oncocytic Schneiderian papillomas: Clinical behavior and outcomes of the endoscopic endonasal approach in 33 cases.

Karligkiotis Apostolos, Bignami Maurizio, Terranova Paola, Gallo Stefania, Meloni Francesco, Padoan Giovanni, Lombardi Davide, Nicolai Piero, Castelnuovo Paolo

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical behavior of oncocytic Schneiderian papillomas in relation to the rate of malignant transformation and recurrences and to report the long-term results of the endoscopic endonasal treatment.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was carried out on patients with oncocytic papilloma, endoscopically managed over the past 20 years, at 2 university centers following a uniform policy.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients were treated between November 1991 and December 2010. The mean follow-up period was 62 months. We observed 2 cases of persistence (6%) at the maxillary sinus level. Both of these patients underwent endoscopic surgical revision. Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) was observed in 1 patient (3%).

CONCLUSION

The endonasal endoscopic technique proved to be a safe and effective approach for the treatment of oncocytic papillomas. An oncocytic papilloma is not to be considered a negative prognostic factor in terms of malignant transformation or recurrence.

Для цитирования: Karligkiotis Apostolos, Bignami Maurizio, Terranova Paola, Gallo Stefania, Meloni Francesco, Padoan Giovanni, Lombardi Davide, Nicolai Piero, Castelnuovo Paolo. Oncocytic Schneiderian papillomas: Clinical behavior and outcomes of the endoscopic endonasal approach in 33 cases.. Head & neck. 2013. DOI: 10.1002/hed.23341.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.