Gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2009
Double-guidewire technique for difficult bile duct cannulation: a multicenter randomized, controlled trial.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Herreros de Tejada Alberto, Calleja Jose Luis, Díaz Gonzalo, Pertejo Virginia, Espinel Jesús, Cacho Guillermo, Jiménez Javier, Millán Isabel, García Fernando, Abreu Luis, UDOGUIA-04 Group
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: ERCP can be associated with serious complications. Difficulty in common bile duct (CBD) cannulation is one of the main risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis. The double-guidewire technique (DGT) has been considered a promising alternative approach in difficult cannulation situations.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the performance of DGT with the standard cannulation technique (SCT) in patients in whom CBD cannulation is difficult to perform.
DESIGN: Multicenter randomized, controlled trial.
SETTING: Six tertiary referral centers.
PATIENTS: A total of 188 patients with difficult CBD cannulation defined by completion of 5 unsuccessful cannulation attempts were enrolled.
INTERVENTIONS: Ninety-seven patients were assigned to the DGT group and 91 to the SCT group. Both techniques were compared for an extra 10 cannulation attempts.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: CBD cannulation rate, number of attempts required to cannulate, and ERCP-related complications.
RESULTS: Successful CBD cannulation was achieved in 46 of 97 (47%) patients in the DGT group compared with 51 of 91 (56%) in the SCT group (OR 0.85; 95% CI, 0.64-1.12). The median number of attempts required for each group was 9 and 7, respectively (P = .128). The incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis was 17% in the DGT group and 8% in the SCT group (OR 2.13; 95% CI, 0.89-5.05).
LIMITATIONS: Reduced number of enrolled subjects and a lack of detailed information regarding the number and extent of pancreatic duct contrast injections.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with difficult CBD cannulation, DGT was not superior to SCT in achieving CBD cannulation. DGT might be associated with a higher risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the performance of DGT with the standard cannulation technique (SCT) in patients in whom CBD cannulation is difficult to perform.
DESIGN: Multicenter randomized, controlled trial.
SETTING: Six tertiary referral centers.
PATIENTS: A total of 188 patients with difficult CBD cannulation defined by completion of 5 unsuccessful cannulation attempts were enrolled.
INTERVENTIONS: Ninety-seven patients were assigned to the DGT group and 91 to the SCT group. Both techniques were compared for an extra 10 cannulation attempts.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: CBD cannulation rate, number of attempts required to cannulate, and ERCP-related complications.
RESULTS: Successful CBD cannulation was achieved in 46 of 97 (47%) patients in the DGT group compared with 51 of 91 (56%) in the SCT group (OR 0.85; 95% CI, 0.64-1.12). The median number of attempts required for each group was 9 and 7, respectively (P = .128). The incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis was 17% in the DGT group and 8% in the SCT group (OR 2.13; 95% CI, 0.89-5.05).
LIMITATIONS: Reduced number of enrolled subjects and a lack of detailed information regarding the number and extent of pancreatic duct contrast injections.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with difficult CBD cannulation, DGT was not superior to SCT in achieving CBD cannulation. DGT might be associated with a higher risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis.