Navigator-triggered prospective acquisition correction (PACE) technique vs. conventional respiratory-triggered technique for free-breathing 3D MRCP: an initial prospective comparative study using healthy volunteers.

PURPOSE: To confirm the superiority of the navigator-triggered prospective acquisition correction (PACE) technique over the conventional respiratory-triggered (RESP) technique, something that has been perceived experimentally but without definite evidence, for free-breathing three-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) using healthy volunteers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Free-breathing 3D turbo spin-echo MRCP using both PACE and RESP techniques were prospectively performed on 25 healthy volunteers. Quantitative analyses of acquisition time, signal-to-noise ratio, contrast-to-noise ratio, and contour sharpness index of each segment of the pancreaticobiliary tree were compared using the paired t-test. Qualitative analyses on a five-point scale (1, excellent; 5, poor) scored by two independent radiologists were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

RESULTS: The subjective image quality and contour sharpness index of each segment of the PACE technique were found to be significantly better than those for RESP (P<0.05). No significant difference was observed with regard to signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios except for the pancreatic duct. No significant difference in acquisition times between PACE and RESP techniques was observed.

CONCLUSION: We confirmed the superiority of the image quality of the PACE technique compared to conventional RESP technique for free-breathing 3D MRCP in healthy volunteers.