European journal of dermatology : EJD · 2014
Clinical implications of distinct metastasizing preferences of different melanoma subtypes.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Schoenewolf Nicola L, Belloni Benedetta, Simcock Mathew, Tonolla Sabina, Vogt Pascale, Scherrer Ellen, Holzmann David, Dummer Reinhard
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The incidence and mortality of malignant melanoma have been rising during the past decades, the latter being due to the high invasion capacity and the metastatic potential of melanoma cells to distant organs.
OBJECTIVE: We investigated the distribution pattern of melanoma metastases taking into account different clinicopathological subtypes of melanoma.
METHODS: We studied 310 stage IV (AJCC 2009) melanoma patients retrospectively with regard to potential correlations between frequency and occurrence of metastasis and the genetic background and pathological/clinical melanoma subtypes. For all patients, the time to distant metastasis (TTDM) and the distribution patterns of metastases were analyzed and correlated to the median survival time.
RESULTS: Superficially Spreading (SSM) and Nodular melanomas (NMM) spread to the brain more frequently than Acrolentiginous (ALM) and Mucosal (MM) melanomas (p = 0.0012). The preference to affect the skeleton was significantly higher for ALM and MM in comparison to SSM and NMM (p = 0.0049). Lentigo maligna (LMM) tumors showed a significantly lower metastatic spread to distant lymph nodes (p = 0.0159). BRAF mutant versus wildtype tumors showed no significant differences concerning localization of metastasis but patients with BRAF mutant tumors were significantly younger at primary diagnosis and had a significantly shorter stage IV survival (p = 0.0106).
CONCLUSION: This study shows a clear distinction of melanoma subtypes with regard to metastasizing preferences. Further knowledge about melanoma subtype specific characteristics, including molecular markers predictive of homing preferences, may help to understand and manage this heterogeneous disease in terms of prognosis and follow-up procedures.
OBJECTIVE: We investigated the distribution pattern of melanoma metastases taking into account different clinicopathological subtypes of melanoma.
METHODS: We studied 310 stage IV (AJCC 2009) melanoma patients retrospectively with regard to potential correlations between frequency and occurrence of metastasis and the genetic background and pathological/clinical melanoma subtypes. For all patients, the time to distant metastasis (TTDM) and the distribution patterns of metastases were analyzed and correlated to the median survival time.
RESULTS: Superficially Spreading (SSM) and Nodular melanomas (NMM) spread to the brain more frequently than Acrolentiginous (ALM) and Mucosal (MM) melanomas (p = 0.0012). The preference to affect the skeleton was significantly higher for ALM and MM in comparison to SSM and NMM (p = 0.0049). Lentigo maligna (LMM) tumors showed a significantly lower metastatic spread to distant lymph nodes (p = 0.0159). BRAF mutant versus wildtype tumors showed no significant differences concerning localization of metastasis but patients with BRAF mutant tumors were significantly younger at primary diagnosis and had a significantly shorter stage IV survival (p = 0.0106).
CONCLUSION: This study shows a clear distinction of melanoma subtypes with regard to metastasizing preferences. Further knowledge about melanoma subtype specific characteristics, including molecular markers predictive of homing preferences, may help to understand and manage this heterogeneous disease in terms of prognosis and follow-up procedures.