MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.mri.2005.04.006

Медицинская библиотека · Magnetic resonance imaging · 2005

Projection screen or video goggles as stimulus modality in functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Engström Maria, Ragnehed Mattias, Lundberg Peter

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

The purpose of this study was to investigate the reliability of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) by using either a projection screen or video goggles as stimulus modality. A sequence of visual stimuli were presented to the same subject at different occasions. The sequence was optimized with a genetic algorithm. In five sessions the stimuli were presented using a projection screen viewed through a mirror in the head coil and in five sessions using video goggles. Failure to detect visual activation in the medial left hemisphere was observed in sessions using the projection screen as stimulus modality. Decreased thresholds for P values and cluster size resulted in activation outside the occipital lobe and did not significantly increase activated areas in this region. Results in this study indicate that presentation of fMRI tasks with visual routes is more reliable with direct input through video goggles than with the conventional use of projection screens. Failure to detect crucial visual areas has severe consequences for tumor surgery in the visual cortex. Inferior visual impression might also have negative consequences for cognitive tests with high demand on attention and perception.

Для цитирования: Engström Maria, Ragnehed Mattias, Lundberg Peter. Projection screen or video goggles as stimulus modality in functional magnetic resonance imaging.. Magnetic resonance imaging. 2005. DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2005.04.006.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.