Neurology · 2005
Impaired spatial coding within objects but not between objects in prosopagnosia.
Клинический случайСтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Barton Jason J S, Cherkasova Mariya V
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Patients with prosopagnosia from occipitotemporal lesions have impaired perception of the configuration of facial features. This may be an example of impaired "within-object" spatial coding, which others propose to be distinct from "between-object" spatial coding.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the prosopagnosic deficit in perceiving spatial configuration was specific to within-face and not between-face spatial coding and whether the deficit was face-selective or extended to objects other than faces.
METHODS: Six prosopagnosic patients were tested using an oddity paradigm in which they detected which of three simultaneously seen stimuli was an altered target. In the "within-face" task, the target face had altered interocular distance or mouth position. In the "between-face" task, the target face was located farther away from the other two. In the "within-object" task, the stimulus was a two-dot pattern, and the target pattern had altered interdot distance.
RESULTS: Spatial judgments were impaired within faces for all six patients and within the two-dot pattern for five of six patients. However, all six had normal between-face spatial perception.
CONCLUSIONS: Impaired perception of spatial relations in prosopagnosia is selective to the spatial structure within individual objects and spares the perception of spatial location of objects. It is not specific to faces. It reveals a process involved in analyzing object structure, consistent with the patients' deficits in recognizing facial identity, and illustrates a different type of "visuospatial" defect.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the prosopagnosic deficit in perceiving spatial configuration was specific to within-face and not between-face spatial coding and whether the deficit was face-selective or extended to objects other than faces.
METHODS: Six prosopagnosic patients were tested using an oddity paradigm in which they detected which of three simultaneously seen stimuli was an altered target. In the "within-face" task, the target face had altered interocular distance or mouth position. In the "between-face" task, the target face was located farther away from the other two. In the "within-object" task, the stimulus was a two-dot pattern, and the target pattern had altered interdot distance.
RESULTS: Spatial judgments were impaired within faces for all six patients and within the two-dot pattern for five of six patients. However, all six had normal between-face spatial perception.
CONCLUSIONS: Impaired perception of spatial relations in prosopagnosia is selective to the spatial structure within individual objects and spares the perception of spatial location of objects. It is not specific to faces. It reveals a process involved in analyzing object structure, consistent with the patients' deficits in recognizing facial identity, and illustrates a different type of "visuospatial" defect.